#156 overall, LD Kyle Aucoin

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
40,977
11,603
Ft. Myers, FL
I like this gamble for them. July birthday his father was quite a bit bigger so maybe he still grows a little bit. Has plenty of time to develop at Harvard. Their are things to work with here, it is a long-rang deal so it reinforces you down the road maybe after we have evaluated other guys. We will see, fascinated to watch the Beanpot this year if it happens with us well represented.
 

DatsyukToZetterberg

Alligator!
Apr 3, 2011
5,550
739
Island of Tortuga
This pick or this draft class?

This kid is super young and skates well with an NHL dad. We are in the 6th round... what do people want?

If skating well is the only thing a player does well that doesn't bode well for there NHL future.

I'd prefer we go with any number of interesting forwards that were on the board at the time that have a chance to at least be impact players. Benjamin Baumgartner, Yevgeni Oksentyuk, Alexander Pashin, Samuel Johannesson, Rory Kerins, Veeti Miettinen, or Connor McClennon all have legitimate middle 6 or bottom pairing upside unlike Aucoin. If Aucoin makes it he's nothing more than a #7 and I'd be shocked if he even makes it above the AHL or even gets offered an ELC. Defenceman that look like him make the NHL about 3-6% of the time so he has an up hill battle ahead of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killerjas

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,228
14,728
If skating well is the only thing a player does well that doesn't bode well for there NHL future.

I'd prefer we go with any number of interesting forwards that were on the board at the time that have a chance to at least be impact players. Benjamin Baumgartner, Yevgeni Oksentyuk, Alexander Pashin, Samuel Johannesson, Rory Kerins, Veeti Miettinen, or Connor McClennon all have legitimate middle 6 or bottom pairing upside unlike Aucoin. If Aucoin makes it he's nothing more than a #7 and I'd be shocked if he even makes it above the AHL or even gets offered an ELC. Defenceman that look like him make the NHL about 3-6% of the time so he has an up hill battle ahead of him.

Have you ever seen Aucoin play? Every pick has to be someone you know about? I just think reading some of these comments, that the expectations are ridiculous, and I can give a little leniency once we get past the first 3-4 rounds to picks like this.
 

DatsyukToZetterberg

Alligator!
Apr 3, 2011
5,550
739
Island of Tortuga
Have you ever seen Aucoin play? Every pick has to be someone you know about? I just think reading some of these comments, that the expectations are ridiculous, and I can give a little leniency once we get past the first 3-4 rounds to picks like this.

No, I haven't, but with a statistical profile like his he should be on every teams DND list. Until he shows that he has actual upside there are less risky picks to make. If you draft a player that has his profile, where say 95% of the time that player busts and doesn't make it to the NHL, you're wasting your pick. If you're picking someone with that sort of probability of success and their only claim is being a "great skater" I think you need to review your selection process. There is a happy medium where NHL prospect models and traditional scouting can co-exist and this would be one of those instances where your model should give you pause before you make the selection.

Expecting to select a player with middle 6 or bottom pairing upside with every pick isn't ridiculous and it's the standard we should hold the team to. Not every pick will develop into an NHLer, but by selecting someone like Aucoin you're relying almost entirely on luck getting him to the NHL.
 

Hatter of the Beach

I’m the real hero
Jun 26, 2017
3,197
3,683
Parkland Estates, Florida
This pick or this draft class?

This kid is super young and skates well with an NHL dad. We are in the 6th round... what do people want?
This pick.

And I would have liked someone like Gogolev or Kittemaki. If they’re unlikely to be a NHLer anyways, I’d personally prefer someone who at least has the tools to maybe become a middle 6/bottom 4 D player.

basically I’d rather have a free .1% lotto ticket potentially worth $10 than find a guaranteed penny. I doubt this guy even sniffs the NHL.
 
Last edited:

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
10,960
8,712
No, I haven't, but with a statistical profile like his he should be on every teams DND list. Until he shows that he has actual upside there are less risky picks to make. If you draft a player that has his profile, where say 95% of the time that player busts and doesn't make it to the NHL, you're wasting your pick. If you're picking someone with that sort of probability of success and their only claim is being a "great skater" I think you need to review your selection process. There is a happy medium where NHL prospect models and traditional scouting can co-exist and this would be one of those instances where your model should give you pause before you make the selection.

Expecting to select a player with middle 6 or bottom pairing upside with every pick isn't ridiculous and it's the standard we should hold the team to. Not every pick will develop into an NHLer, but by selecting someone like Aucoin you're relying almost entirely on luck getting him to the NHL.
OK. But if the type of player you describe has a 5 percent chance of making the NHL, what percent chance to other 6th rounders have? 7 percent? Maybe 10?

I understand the logic, but we're talking about splitting hairs over guys that are inherently long shots to begin with.
 

DatsyukToZetterberg

Alligator!
Apr 3, 2011
5,550
739
Island of Tortuga
OK. But if the type of player you describe has a 5 percent chance of making the NHL, what percent chance to other 6th rounders have? 7 percent? Maybe 10?

I understand the logic, but we're talking about splitting hairs over guys that are inherently long shots to begin with.

It depends on the player. Someone like Pashin for example makes it to the NHL about 50% of the, Rory Kerins was about 45%, and someone like Yevgeni Oksentyuk was about 35%. While you're correct the average 6th rounder is at about 7%, the individual players that are available are sometimes much higher than their draft slot.
 

Astyanax

Registered User
May 5, 2020
387
123
It depends on the player. Someone like Pashin for example makes it to the NHL about 50% of the, Rory Kerins was about 45%, and someone like Yevgeni Oksentyuk was about 35%. While you're correct the average 6th rounder is at about 7%, the individual players that are available are sometimes much higher than their draft slot.
6th rounders are all long shot to make it, granted. So the question is why not swing big.
If aucion makes it, he is 3rd pair but if pashin manages to crack the nhl it will be as a 2nd line dynamic playmaker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DatsyukToZetterberg

TheOtherOne

Registered User
Jan 2, 2010
8,273
5,266
It depends on the player. Someone like Pashin for example makes it to the NHL about 50% of the, Rory Kerins was about 45%, and someone like Yevgeni Oksentyuk was about 35%. While you're correct the average 6th rounder is at about 7%, the individual players that are available are sometimes much higher than their draft slot.
lol where are all these fantasy numbers coming from? Half of all the Pashins in the multiverse are NHL players?
 
  • Like
Reactions: waltdetroit

DatsyukToZetterberg

Alligator!
Apr 3, 2011
5,550
739
Island of Tortuga
lol where are all these fantasy numbers coming from? Half of all the Pashins in the multiverse are NHL players?

EjwhanUVcAAS6Ty

They're not fantasy numbers by any stretch, but feel free to "lol" at them. By most models Pashin was looking like an NHLer in most of them. In the one I've linked to players that follow his NHLe progression develop into NHLers, in this case defined as > 100 gp, 68% of the time and in 25% of the cases they've developed into start players, defined as > 0.70 points per game at the NHL. My own simple model had him ranked as a 25th overall pick and players in that ranking developed into an NHLer in about 50% of the cases.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
15,884
10,428
At 156th overall, all he has to do is play a handful of NHL game to be considered a "good use of the 156th overall pick".

Heck, if he even gets signed that is an accomplishment.
 

WaW

Armchair Assistant Coffee Gofer for the GM
Mar 18, 2017
2,568
3,086
Weird pick because he's going to Harvard. You don't go to Harvard if you intend to turn pro at 19 or 20. He's gonna spend all 4 years there then be a free agent. Kinda feels like if he proves to be great value it won't matter because he'll choose where he plays after his senior year is done.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,186
12,165
Tampere, Finland
Weird pick because he's going to Harvard. You don't go to Harvard if you intend to turn pro at 19 or 20. He's gonna spend all 4 years there then be a free agent. Kinda feels like if he proves to be great value it won't matter because he'll choose where he plays after his senior year is done.

Usually these guys will get signed earlier, like after 3 years, if the college hockey career goes well. Then they only have the one year to complete after a hockey career.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad