Or just straight up say that it was not a good year for the Q and that they are in the business of winning the Stanley Cup not being a charity.
Fit in like Archambault??can't even produce in the Q, he'll fit in perfectly here
As if they weren't saying enough bull**** already. 23 players from the QMJHL were selected.
That would be 3 years in a row though.....that’s a tough sell (not that I care or anything)Or just straight up say that it was not a good year for the Q and that they are in the business of winning the Stanley Cup not being a charity.
That would be 3 years in a row though.....that’s a tough sell (not that I care or anything)
I agree......damage control should be done in the 7th round in the 220th pick range and this every 3 years.They are still not a charity. The media needs to get over it. Not the scouting staff.
They are still not a charity. The media needs to get over it. Not the scouting staff.
This is true however HF might have to calm down too.
This theory that the Habs have a strong bias for the QMJHL doesn't hold much ground considering they've only draft 2 players out of the Q since 2015. (8, including Andrighetton an Reway, in 7 years since Bergevin has been hired.)
Montreal should be biased for the best player available, not a f***in league.This is true however HF might have to calm down too.
This theory that the Habs have a strong bias for the QMJHL doesn't hold much ground considering they've only draft 2 players out of the Q since 2015. (8, including Andrighetto and Reway, in 7 years since Bergevin has been hired.)
The thing with Houde is that he was a dominating player till now everybody thought he would produce a lot this season. I guess they think he was not getting enough ice time on the third line to produce and also he still played a solid defensive game. He's a legit prospect if you follow the Q, if you only look at hockey dB it doesn't look good, he's still a fifth rounder, but he's gonna get the hate because of his last name.
The thing with Houde is that he was a dominating player till now everybody thought he would produce a lot this season. I guess they think he was not getting enough ice time on the third line to produce and also he still played a solid defensive game. He's a legit prospect if you follow the Q, if you only look at hockey dB it doesn't look good, he's still a fifth rounder, but he's gonna get the hate because of his last name.
And? The two best players selected from the league didn't meet the media's criteria (not french). Veleno almost fell out of the first round. Beaudin went too high and was a first round pick. Kurashev is an import. A majority were goalies. Which french player did we pass on that was better than who we took at the same rank? Cause I certainly couldn't find any.
How do you not take Jenkins instead? Just tell the media that you are a big fan of the Q guys you invited to the camp and maybe sign one just to shut them up. But this is just terrible.
I keep reading that the organization has a strong bias towards Québec players and that it's a xenophobic stategy (actual quote of one poster here), so I went back to our three last draft and turns out that out of the 24 players we selected, ... ONE, Samuel Houde, is from Québec.
One out of 24. When like another poster pointed out, around 10% of players selected are from the QMJHL. Tell me again how the Canadiens suck because they focus too much on Quebec talent.
How do you not take Jenkins instead? Just tell the media that you are a big fan of the Q guys you invited to the camp and maybe sign one just to shut them up. But this is just terrible.
We just need to accept that management has to select a french player just to keep the french media off their back. I don't blame the org for that, I blame the french media itself. I think we had other french targets who were much closer to BPA targets (Beaudin early 2nd for example), they just never made it to the picks we wanted to take them at.People find it odd that we are complaining about a 5th rounder? Yea, a 5th rounder probably won't make the NHL, but by not going bpa(not even close) you are just lowering your chances.