Little Fury
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2006
- 17,831
- 6,800
There’s a debate there for sure. Should he have been brought up while issues were still apparent in his AHL game and he didn’t even tear the AHL up. Usually a player gets brought up when it’s become apparent they can go POint per game at the AHL level. Pulju didn’t get to that point. On the flip side of that though, if Oilers fans weren’t complaining about his NHL deployment back then they were complaining about him not being up. The consensus was that he should be brought up back then, even I was guilty of this, going so far as to blame our AHL coach for making him focus on his game away from the puck too much instead of just turning him into an offensive powerhouse.
Also sometimes players spend time in the AHL to work on physical aspects of their game. Like foot speed, or size, or shot or something. Pulju already has these tools in spades. So the question is, where would be best to learn the Xs and Os or mental aspect of the game, maybe it’s the NHL, maybe AHL there’s a debate there.
But if it’s decided that it’s NHL, he has to earn the minutes in ways that he can definately show in a 3rd line role.
I have no idea if he was handled correctly in his time in the AHL or what kind of opportunity he got. My impression was the old staff heavily favoured veterans and that the big club wasn't altogether happy with how things were run down there.
As for the bold, I don't disagree (most of my beef here has been with Caggiula getting golden opportunities). But I also feel like "doing the right things" doesn't necessarily correlate with good results and can be overemphasized. If I had a choice between a hard worker who did all the right things and still gets caved in versus a guy who is a loose cannon but still ends up on the right side of the scoresheet, I think I'd choose the latter.