Dakota Sioux
Wild Time
Never have had a problem with the guy.No one liked Koepka to start. Now we actively dislike him.
Boom. His to lose now
Never have had a problem with the guy.No one liked Koepka to start. Now we actively dislike him.
It’s a lot better than 3 regular tour events and 1 major.
Not sure why regular tour events matter so much too you.
Never have had a problem with the guy.
Boom. His to lose now
Nice tourney by Cink
There are four of them every year, and I think when you win them disproportionately to your ability to win regular events, I think thats unfortunate for the sport. Who benefits in that case besides that specific player? Majors define legacies. This guy stomps all over that. He can not be a star with 1 regular tour win. Regular tour events are the predominant share of the events he plays, and he sucks in those. But he's going to ruin the ability for the sport to benefit.
Fair play to him, but I don't know why golf fans or media would approve of that.
It truly is strange.I honestly think Koepka doesn't care about regular events, and so he doesn't bring his best game to them. I don't know what else could explain it. Because it's not like he's frequently contending in regular events and coming up short... the guy almost never even comes close to winning at non-majors.
To answer your question at the end I guess I don't care about how many regular event wins a guy has. Koepka is clearly a top level golfer so it isn't like he is a fluke guy who got lucky one weekend. Those are the guys I hate to see win (Hamilton, Beem, Curtis).
Koepka definitely has the talent that his wins aren't some fluke, he has wins in other tours so it seems his lack of PGA wins likely has a lot to do with his short-ish time on the tour and he does well in other majors even when he doesn't win.
Maybe I am in the minority but his lack of regular tour wins means nothing to me. I could see not liking him because he is pretty bland or because of his comments about liking golf, but the tour wins is odd.
I honestly think Koepka doesn't care about regular events, and so he doesn't bring his best game to them. I don't know what else could explain it. Because it's not like he's frequently contending in regular events and coming up short... the guy almost never even comes close to winning at non-majors.
Once again, you can't blame him for trying to win majors, but in the range of which wins would benefit the sport, Koepka is far down the list, not too much higher than the fluke winners.
I honestly think Koepka doesn't care about regular events, and so he doesn't bring his best game to them. I don't know what else could explain it. Because it's not like he's frequently contending in regular events and coming up short... the guy almost never even comes close to winning at non-majors.
Tiger's back officially! Koepka had a weekend, whatever I don't truly care. Good for him. Tiger still should have won. The first 2 holes of the week cost him, he still had a chance. Bad break on one amd at 14. Both looked to be putts that were going in. Struggled hitting fairways and still had a shot. All those looks missed on the back 9 yesterday. He beat himself more than Koepka beat him.
What?
Koepka can likely look at all the bad breaks he got and lower his score as well. Koepka did beat him, this was not a case of Tiger losing it it was clearly Koepka winning it.