1-0 lead

Cynick

Know-Nothing
Dec 24, 2008
3,728
453
Toronto
This year, it's 75.0% so far. Of the six teams that won the first game and went onto win the series, three did it on home ice.
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
Going up 1-0 on home ice means you're the higher seeded team.

I'd wager the numbers are pretty good.
 

Sadekuuro

Registered User
Aug 23, 2005
6,838
1,221
Cascadia
Teams that take a 1-0 lead in a 7 game series are 426-195 (.686) all-time. Home teams are 303-99 (.754) in such series.
 

PrototypeX85

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
2,471
585
Game 2 winners actually have the highest series win percentage in NHL playoff history.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,730
29,190
I'd also be more interested in seeing a disparity between first and second round.
 

Machinehead

GoAwayTrouba
Jan 21, 2011
142,212
112,228
NYC
Teams that take a 1-0 lead in a 7 game series are 426-195 (.686) all-time. Home teams are 303-99 (.754) in such series.

I'd be interested to see how much closer that gets to .500 after the series is tied, because I'm sure it skyrockets at 2-0.
 

Sadekuuro

Registered User
Aug 23, 2005
6,838
1,221
Cascadia
That's a good point. I'd be more interested to see the lower seeded numbers after taking game 1.

Subtract the home numbers from the total above; teams that win Game 1 on the road are 123-96 (.562) in the series.

I'd also be more interested in seeing a disparity between first and second round.

Teams winning Game 1 in the first round [four round era] are 136-80 (.630), with home G1 winners going 91-38 (.705); teams winning Game 1 in the conference semis are 129-55 (.701), with home G1 winners going 93-31 (.750).
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,730
29,190
Subtract the home numbers from the total above; teams that win Game 1 on the road are 123-96 (.562) in the series.



Teams winning Game 1 in the first round [four round era] are 136-80 (.630), with home G1 winners going 91-38 (.705); teams winning Game 1 in the conference semis are 129-55 (.701), with home G1 winners going 93-31 (.750).

Awesome - thanks.
 

SotasicA

Registered User
Aug 25, 2014
8,489
6,404
Thank you, Sadekuuro.

/thread

Though source would be nice, so we know where to go the next time. I'm sure you didn't just tally everything yourself?
 

Sadekuuro

Registered User
Aug 23, 2005
6,838
1,221
Cascadia
Though source would be nice, so we know where to go the next time. I'm sure you didn't just tally everything yourself?

www.whowins.com

I'd be interested to see how much closer that gets to .500 after the series is tied, because I'm sure it skyrockets at 2-0.

As you can see from the link, they don't appear to have data for tied series, just ones where one team is ahead. I think that's because if you added everyone's numbers together you'd get exactly .500, since each 1-1 series has two teams in that situation and invariably one wins and the other loses. (The numbers are indeed brutal for teams down 0-2, though.)

I do have some team data of my own but I'd have to add them up team by team and it would probably just come out .500 anyway.

But you might be interested to know that the Rangers specifically are 12-36 (.250) in series in which they trail 0-1, but 23-21 (.523) in series tied 1-1.
 

slappipappi

Registered User
Jul 22, 2010
4,467
191
Game 2 winners actually have the highest series win percentage in NHL playoff history.

Higher than game 7 winners? (100%)

I think what you meant, is that between game 1 winners and game 2 winners, game 2 winners have the higher win %.
 

Not So Mighty

Enjoy your freedom, you wintertimer.
Aug 2, 2010
2,971
1,004
Omicron Pesei 8
Game 2 winners actually have the highest series win percentage in NHL playoff history.

I used to like that fact but having thought about it more, it's not that surprising.

If you won the second game you are either tied or winning 2-0. Being up 2-0 implies you're most probably the better team and you definitely have a much easier road to advancing. Tying the series 1-1 gains you momentum, confidence, and puts a lot of pressure on the opponent.

It makes perfect sense that history supports Game 2 winners.
 

SavedByRoy

Bite the noose
Feb 17, 2006
453
252
Fort Myers
If you won the second game you are either tied or winning 2-0. Being up 2-0 implies you're most probably the better team and you definitely have a much easier road to advancing. Tying the series 1-1 gains you momentum, confidence, and puts a lot of pressure on the opponent.

It makes perfect sense that history supports Game 2 winners.

Doesn't winning game 1 also gain you momentum, confidence, and puts a lot of pressure on your opponent?
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
28,995
10,626
Charlotte, NC
Doesn't winning game 1 also gain you momentum, confidence, and puts a lot of pressure on your opponent?

The general impression I get is that game 1s are much more highly influenced by adrenaline. In game 2, the relative ability of the teams is more apparent.
 

SladeWilson23

I keep my promises.
Sponsor
Nov 3, 2014
26,735
3,220
New Jersey
Teams that take a 1-0 lead in a 7 game series are 426-195 (.686) all-time. Home teams are 303-99 (.754) in such series.

The team with the visiting ice disadvantage are 123-96 which is still pretty good. Also, home teams win game 1's 65% of the time.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad