Zach Hamill

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Rich09, May 16, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rich09

    Rich09 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I saw a few times people talking about Zach Hamill over here. Is he projected to be a superstar and the unanimus 1st overall 2007 draft? Does he have a better potentiel than Angelo Esposito? Is he as good as other 1st picks like Kessel(should be), Ovechkin, Nash, Kovalchuk...
     
  2. Le Golie

    Le Golie ...

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2002
    Messages:
    8,363
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    146
    He's certainly a front runner for 2007, but so many things can change. His numbers in the WHL are pretty impressive for his age and he has very, very good potential but he's not a phenom. Over the next two years so much will change. He's as good a pick as any at this point.
     
  3. Rich09

    Rich09 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm in a sim league where you can pick any player you want in any year. I have to choose between Hamill, Toews, Little, Esposito and Tavares. What would be your choices in ordre. Bertram, Stoa, Weber, Streit and Grabovsky are free agents too, but I don't think that I should take those before Hamil and cie. Do you agree?
     
  4. Crosby=Gretzky

    Crosby=Gretzky Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    959
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    School
    Location:
    i lost myself
    What's the name of that league? If there is any room for me I would love to join. To the question now. It's pretty hard to compare the players b/c Tavares is just 14, and Streit is 27. ;) I think you should take Hamill or Weber. Hamill is the best player of all those undrafted players(IMO) and Weber is the best of the other players. Take Weber if you need a stabile D, but take Hamill if you want pure offense and pretty good defense. But if you take Hamill, you'll have to wait one year or two, before Hamill is fully developed. That's my opinion.
     
  5. Rich09

    Rich09 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok so you think that Hamill have better chances to be a NHL star than Toews and Little?
     
  6. Crosby=Gretzky

    Crosby=Gretzky Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    959
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    School
    Location:
    i lost myself
    Yes, I do. And what's the name of the league you're in?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"