scarbrow21
Registered User
WPG: Rasmuss Andersson
CGY: Nic Petan + Joel Armia
Does anything need to be added? On which side?
CGY: Nic Petan + Joel Armia
Does anything need to be added? On which side?
Yeh Myers likely on the move. They have Poolman who could slot into that spot but after that RHD depth is thin.Soooo I guess this is assuming Winnipeg is moving out Myers? Otherwise that right side seems too crowded to add Andersson. Think the value is alright though
Is Rasmus top pairing potential? Vesalainen def has top line potential based off the season he just had in Liiga.Nope. I’d want a Vesalainen if I’m trading a prospect like Rasmus
I’m sure you wouldNope. I’d want a Vesalainen if I’m trading a prospect like Rasmus
Is Rasmus top pairing potential? Vesalainen def has top line potential based off the season he just had in Liiga.
Andersson looks to have unlimited potential, he's excelled everywhere. The onl;y issues with him have been conditioning and nutrition, both of which he was worked very hard on and recently moved to Calgary to work on it even more with the team.Is Rasmus top pairing potential? Vesalainen def has top line potential based off the season he just had in Liiga.
Petan shoots left but plays a 3 forward positions. TSN has him listed as RW while Capfriendly & SN have him as LW/RW. Good versatile player but a victim of the Jets being over loaded @ forward. I personally like him but do prefer the players waiting to take his spot. It's the #s game but in this case so many good young forwards but not enough spots for all.Man, I really have to think on this one. I like Andersson better than any of our D prospects except Valimaki maybe, but this one does make me think.
I'd "guess" we'd be more likely to move him as part of a package for an upgrade like Girard was for Nashville, or for a more 1 for 1 sort of swap instead of multiple pieces coming back.
Value is probably there, just not sure if I pull the trigger without more thought. Petan likely doesn't play C for us, and to my understanding he's played more LW, which is decently stacked for us assuming Bennett isn't moved, so that might play a part in it as well.
Nope. I’d want a Vesalainen if I’m trading a prospect like Rasmus
Wouldn't trade 3 Rasmus Anderssons for 1/2 a Schiefle and a TroubaI wouldn’t trade Vesalainen for 3 Ramus Andersson’s
I wouldn’t trade Vesalainen for 3 Ramus Andersson’s
WPG: Rasmuss Andersson
CGY: Nic Petan + Joel Armia
Does anything need to be added? On which side?
It's a good offer but I really don't want to move Andersson. For me to move him, I'd like a better RW coming back even if we have to add onto it to make that happen. I'm not as big a fan of Armia as some are. As someone mentioned above though, I'd offer Kylington for Armia?
Wouldn't trade 3 Rasmus Anderssons for 1/2 a Schiefle and a Trouba
Wow, clearly you have no idea what your talking about. Worst thing i have read today, and I read the EK-hoffman thread.
So apparently saying Vesalainen’s worth is so much higher than Anderssons is worse than a woman bullying another woman after and before her horrific and tragic stillbirth, that’s not heartless.
So ....... will he be the 6th or the 7th top4 D man for the Flames?No thanks Andersson is gonna be a future top 4 d man for us.