Holden Caulfield
Eternal Skeptic
Add me to the list of people who felt a long while back that Poolman has potential, even when others laughed it off. I happen to thing the same about Karlstrom - there is something very intriguing about his game too.
This post nicely sums up why judging players based on summer development camps is a really poor way to assess talent. Sure maybe Poolman (who you have to remember was 2 years older than everyone else at first dev camp) stood out and has developed to be a potential prospect. Then you have all the Karlstrom's who bust after that nice dev camp.
Drills are really really bad ways to judge players. Scrimmages with no systems are really really bad way to judge players. Off-season form is a really really bad way to judge players. It's just not a useful tool for judging players. It's a useful tool for players to get NHL coaching and help their game though which is why Jets do it, not for fans to judge potential of players.
I can pick names out of hat for a favourite darkhorse prospect and maybe that prospect becomes a player for the Jets. Doesn't change the fact that picking the name out of the hat was a bad strategy for me to basis my "pick" of who would be good.