Wilson charging on Wennberg (no supplementary discipline)

Is this suspendable?


  • Total voters
    99

Chips

Registered User
Aug 19, 2015
8,336
7,070
Certainly not a suspension. Not as bad as Anderson’s either. Traveled less distance intending to hit (if I remember right, haven’t seen Anderson’s since last night), was less late (barely late if at all).

Size of the hit is irrelevant. Wilson is a big, strong player, his hit will look bigger; doesn’t make it less legal.
 

izlez

We need more toe-drags/60
Feb 28, 2012
4,623
3,510
Wennberg didn't have his head down at any point during this play. He cannot turn his head 180 degrees like an owl, therefore he had no physical way to see Wilson approaching him from behind to lay a completely unnecessary hit the instant he turned back up ice.
ok. Behind him.

Why should I care if he sees him approaching or not, if the hit is otherwise clean? He didn't hit him in the back.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,152
138,207
Bojangles Parking Lot
ok. Behind him.

Why should I care if he sees him approaching or not, if the hit is otherwise clean? He didn't hit him in the back.

Because body checking is supposed to serve a defensive purpose, to separate players from the puck. Not to make a game of "gotcha" hits where you try and take people out when they're nowhere near the puck and not able to see you coming.

Not to mention, it's a cowardly way to play the game. We used to not have to deal with this kind of junk because there was fighting to balance it out. If we can't have fighting, we can't have this either.
 

Chips

Registered User
Aug 19, 2015
8,336
7,070
The words “dirty” and especially “filthy” lose some meaning on this forum every time there’s a Wilson thread
 

hector morrison

Registered User
Apr 1, 2018
4,792
1,998
Because body checking is supposed to serve a defensive purpose, to separate players from the puck. Not to make a game of "gotcha" hits where you try and take people out when they're nowhere near the puck and not able to see you coming.

Not to mention, it's a cowardly way to play the game. We used to not have to deal with this kind of junk because there was fighting to balance it out. If we can't have fighting, we can't have this either.
Well said! So, Wilson really got no suspension for this? I think it's worse than what Doughty did! Perhaps Kadri will not be suspended as well!
 

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,026
11,719
Not sure if this is suspendable based on the replays shown.

Is there an angle that shows this in better detail? With more context?
 

izlez

We need more toe-drags/60
Feb 28, 2012
4,623
3,510
Because body checking is supposed to serve a defensive purpose, to separate players from the puck. Not to make a game of "gotcha" hits where you try and take people out when they're nowhere near the puck and not able to see you coming.

Not to mention, it's a cowardly way to play the game. We used to not have to deal with this kind of junk because there was fighting to balance it out. If we can't have fighting, we can't have this either.
That's fine....if you want to change the rules.
I just don't get complaining about a play, demanding a suspension, or criticizing a player for playing within the rules that are set out in front of him.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,651
1,616
Remember, that’s exactly what the situation was for the Cooke/Savard hit.
And every single hit Scott Stevens ever made. It's a contact sport, you're going to occasionally get contact you're not expecting that, in no way, makes it illegal or something you can legislate out of the game. It is what it is.
 

Calicaps

NFA
Aug 3, 2006
21,936
14,305
Almost Canada
Let me puke first for defending Wilson... if Wennberg doesn't bend over/lower himself to turn then Wilson wouldn't hit his head. I've watched the video 20 times trying to fault Wilson but I just can't.
Edit: Let me edit this post. I mean for a suspension. A 2 minute penalty for charging was warranted.
It's this. Wilson shouldn't have jumped into the hit. That was stupid. But he came in from the side, not at the numbers and only made contact with the head because Wennberg bent down. By contrast, Anderson drove Kempny into the boards face first with clear view of the name on the back of his sweater.

One is 2. The other is 5+ a game + should be more but doesn't even seem to rate a thread on HF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: third man in

MattMartin

Killer Instinct™
Feb 10, 2007
17,525
10,093
Long Island
3 games should do it.

giphy.gif
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,651
1,616
You realize that every example we just cited is now illegal? :dunno:
The point is one is revered the other reviled. The game has changed yet Scott Stevens didn't win fewer Cups because of it. If you think Tom Wilson should be suspended or even penalized for legally hitting a guy who didn't see him coming I'm sorry that's ridiculous. Nothing Wilson did was sufficiently outside the rules to require supplemental discipline. There was likely head contact that was incidental and a result of a legal hit, it happens.

You question the defensive purpose of the hit Wilson laid? The next time Wennberg is in the same situation and makes an errant play on the puck without awareness of who's coming from where don't you think he's going to be looking over his shoulder? I'm pretty sure that alone serves defensive purpose.

I guess every forechecker should just politely inquire if the opposing player wants to be hit when they go for a puck retrieval and if they reply in the affirmative the attacking player should be certain their target is comfortable and braced before pursuing the hit?
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
15,906
14,492
Wilson being Wilson. Although the hit doesn't look that bad, Wennberg doesn't look like he was expecting the hit at all.
When you’re tied up with one guy and then another guy steams in from the blindside, it makes sense.
Chickenshit Wilson.
 

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
33,442
14,170
Exurban Cbus
It's this. Wilson shouldn't have jumped into the hit. That was stupid. But he came in from the side, not at the numbers and only made contact with the head because Wennberg bent down. By contrast, Anderson drove Kempny into the boards face first with clear view of the name on the back of his sweater.

One is 2. The other is 5+ a game + should be more but doesn't even seem to rate a thread on HF.

Lol sure. Except that one went up right away.

http://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/josh-anderson-tossed-for-boarding-kempny.2477113/
 
  • Like
Reactions: CPTN71

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
15,906
14,492
Because body checking is supposed to serve a defensive purpose, to separate players from the puck. Not to make a game of "gotcha" hits where you try and take people out when they're nowhere near the puck and not able to see you coming.

Not to mention, it's a cowardly way to play the game. We used to not have to deal with this kind of junk because there was fighting to balance it out. If we can't have fighting, we can't have this either.
So much truth here.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
15,906
14,492
There is a reason certain players are discussed while others are not. Some players hit to impede or remove a player from the puck, others hit to inflict pain. The latter cross the line more time than the former.
Exactly. This is hockey. Not Thunderdome.
 

MAHJ71

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2014
11,717
3,999
NWA 217
I rarely think hits are suspendable no matter who it is. Unless it’s super egregious which this was not. It was an opportunistic borderline hit but not egregious.

The puck is long gone, it was a garbage hit.

Nothing was done about it, thats fine too. He'll get whats coming to him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad