Confirmed with Link: Wild sign D Jon Merrill (1 year, $850k)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Puhis

Nah.
Jul 4, 2011
11,508
747
Jaervenpaeae
Sounds like a useful signing for some injury depth or taking the occasional tough match-up in 3rd pair. I like it, especially at the price.

Here is what The Athletic on their article NHL free agency: The 10 best players still available on the market had to say about Merrill:

3371a8d640022e8488dd93c4981aab4e.png
 

Nino Noderreiter

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
4,726
707
The Twin Cities
Not a bad add. I would have rather rolled the dice with Mennell on this same deal, but it does put it into perspective what a legit sort of bottom pairing or even slightly better d man can be worth if they have a season of inconsistency.
 

Puhis

Nah.
Jul 4, 2011
11,508
747
Jaervenpaeae
Fair deal. Interested to see how Evason does the pairings.

I'm guessing:

Brodin - Dumba
Goligoski - Spurgeon
Kulikov - Addison

Then, vs. tougher teams like Colorado:

Brodin-Dumba
Goligoski-Spurgeon
Kulikov - Merrill

That's just my hunch. Of course, here's hoping Addison forces himself into our top-6 permanently and we can alter Kulikov/Merrill as his D-partner. Alternatively, there's also the option of playing Merrill with Spurgeon to bring a defensive-minded big body into the mix, which would leave Goligoski with young pup Addison to serve as his mentor. But, the above is how I reckon they'll go into the season, given things stay as they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Minnesnota

GordieGallant

Registered User
Oct 6, 2020
1,861
459
East Metro, soon to be Up North.
I'm guessing:

Brodin - Dumba
Goligoski - Spurgeon
Kulikov - Addison

Then, vs. tougher teams like Colorado:

Brodin-Dumba
Goligoski-Spurgeon
Kulikov - Merrill

That's just my hunch. Of course, here's hoping Addison forces himself into our top-6 permanently and we can alter Kulikov/Merrill as his D-partner. Alternatively, there's also the option of playing Merrill with Spurgeon to bring a defensive-minded big body into the mix, which would leave Goligoski with young pup Addison to serve as his mentor. But, the above is how I reckon they'll go into the season, given things stay as they are.
It will be Brodin and Dumba. Goligowski and Spurgeon, and Merrill and Kulikov. Addison will have to play his way into the lineup. All in all I think BBB did a decent job in free agency.
 

2Pair

Registered User
Oct 8, 2017
12,633
5,103
1st good signing from BG

Not as mobile as Soucy but very serviceable
I think all 3 defenseman are good signing considering what Billy gave himself to work with. Goligoski is a pretty bad overpay but it's only for a year, and if it's true that it was done to bring the cost down, then that might be the first really intelligent move made by ol' big balls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Circulartheory

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
6,591
3,578
Minneapolis, MN
Top 10 Dman Greg Pateryn... I know, i know, at 850K it's hard to complain.
No, it's a good point. Merrill and Pateryn being on the list really helps illustrate the primary issue with /60 stats. That is, that they favor people who do well in limited roles. Give Merrill or Pateryn the Brodin minutes, and I highly doubt they show up on that list anymore.

Anyway, I've never been a huge fan of Jon Merrill, but that's largely because I felt he never lived up to what I expected before he was drafted. At this current price, it's very hard to complain about him, as he's definitely at least an NHL defenseman, and I was getting just a tad bit worried that we wouldn't be able to find three of those in free agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mickey the mouse

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,325
20,060
MN
Merrill and Kulikov should be ok as long as they stay in their lanes and don't try to do too much. We've got PMD's. We need guys who can defend who have a bit of heft to them. I am hopeful that Gaudreau, Sturm, and JEE will be solid as C's who can defend, which should help our D out.

If a guy like Addison or Mermis plays so well that they grab a job from one of these guys, no harm done.
 

Jesus comma Brodin

Effing Norris-Byng Brodin
Feb 22, 2013
7,612
3,086
Minnesota
I think this was the best FA signing by BBB and is a tremendous value. Surprised he didn’t have more suitors.

Also, 99% of my takeaway from this thread is that Brodin is even better than I thought due to that metric/graph that @Puhis posted.
 

Jesus comma Brodin

Effing Norris-Byng Brodin
Feb 22, 2013
7,612
3,086
Minnesota
No, it's a good point. Merrill and Pateryn being on the list really helps illustrate the primary issue with /60 stats. That is, that they favor people who do well in limited roles. Give Merrill or Pateryn the Brodin minutes, and I highly doubt they show up on that list anymore.

Anyway, I've never been a huge fan of Jon Merrill, but that's largely because I felt he never lived up to what I expected before he was drafted. At this current price, it's very hard to complain about him, as he's definitely at least an NHL defenseman, and I was getting just a tad bit worried that we wouldn't be able to find three of those in free agency.

The lead into graphic in The Athletic article says that those metrics are over the course of the last 3 seasons where and only include defensemen with greater than 1500 total minutes. Although I think your point still stands, I was surprised to see this.
 

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
6,591
3,578
Minneapolis, MN
The lead into graphic in The Athletic article says that those metrics are over the course of the last 3 seasons where and only include defensemen with greater than 1500 total minutes. Although I think your point still stands, I was surprised to see this.

This is a good point. It makes me wonder how Merrill was used the two season prior to this last one. Was he getting a good amount of minutes as a #5-6, or did he have one really big season in there somewhere? 1500 minutes over 3 seasons basically just means "full time NHL defenseman". For reference, Pateryn picked up 1370 of those 1500 minutes in 18-19, when he was getting 17 minutes per game on our third pairing.

Ok, I decided to just look rather than wonder:

Looking at Merrill, it appears he did have a really nice season for Vegas that first year (of the last 3), but it apparently also saw his least, and easiest, usage per game. Also worth noting, he saw the largest majority of his playtime in that one good season, as it was his last "full" season. I put quotes around that, because he only played 57 games, but it wasn't COVID shortened. As his play-time per game has gone up, and his usage has gotten more difficult, he appears to have played significantly worse by both traditional stats and advanced analytics. I think both of these guys, Pateryn and Merrill, are being buoyed by a single good season.

I also came to the conclusion that a half-time 3rd pairing defender could make it to 1500 minutes over three healthy seasons, but it'd be close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad