CarlRacki said:
Have you ever negotiated for something, i.e. a house, car, job? If so, you know very well you don't submit an offer and say "This is it, but I'm willing to change it." Besides the fact you'd be undercutting yourself, that sort of thing is assumed. That's what makes it a negotiation.
Bob and Ted knew very well that the triggers were up for negotiation and they simply chose not to negotiate them. That's their right, but I'd appreciate it if they wouldn't lie to me and, as a pair of very experienced negotiaters, tell me they didn't think it was possible.
thats the first thing that came to mind. After the first couple of times, Listening to the NHLPA say "We were lead to believe that these points werent negotiable" only leads me to believe that not one person on the NHLPA's side has any idea how to negotiate.
We read and are told how great of a negotiator Bob Goodenow is, yet he and his group cant come up with a way to negotiate points that are OBVIOUSLY put there to negotiate.
Even if the poitns were 100% non-negotiable. Make the NHL Look like idiots, and counter basing a compromise on those points. Call the NHL out, instead of sitting on your hands and making the NHL's job incredibly easy.
Then again, it reminds me of a Law and Order Episode i saw. A Public Defender was purposly not "defending his client to the best of his ability" thereby forcing the judge to give the case more time, in order for a Hot Shot Attorney to come in. the NHLPA isnt showing an unwillingness to negotiate, they just seem to be lacking the ABILITY too. You have to wonder if they are playing dumb on purpose.
Though that would implay the NHLPA is then purposly trashing the season to see the NHL's hand. And thats an expensive price to play.