If you've watched Ekblad, he struggles on the road in his own end at times.
Dahlin would need to be a second/third pairing D and the GM needs to do his job and get a first pairing defenceman instead of making fans expect an 18 year old kid to do the role. It was stupid when people thought Mete could do the job and it's the same expecting Dahlin to do it. If this is supposed to be a Stanley Cup team, there needs to be two proper first pair defencemen on the first pair. Instead he signed Alzner and Streit to replace Markov and Emelin.
(If this is a rebuilding team, which it should be, getting Dahlin is fine because the expectation isn't anything other than develop. But expecting Dahlin to be your retool to get back to Cup contention is so broken.)
You can't compare Mete and Dahlin. Also, I never said Dahlin has to be #2 first year. I'm saying it won't take him 3 years. That's all I'm saying.
Just the same IF we get Dahlin which is not likely but if we do:
Weber(1)
Petry(3)
Dahlin(3-4, second pairing is fair no?)
Alzner(4-5)
Juulsen, Mete(Hard to project but 4-6 depending on development, I'd say more bottom pair)
Schlemko,Benn, Reilly (Bottom pair)
It looks better already since start of last season with Streit in the fold...With Mete, Juulsen, Dahlin and even Lernout, Valiev as depth it's got some young upcoming talent with Dahlin as centerpiece.
Who knows. I think Dahlin will be fine within 3 years no problem. Never said he'll be leading the charge year 1.
BTW never said Dahlin alone will get us to contention. Dahlin+Tavares can.