I agree it's not what's being asked. The question is who will be the better player. I don't have a problem with either answer. My uneducated guess is 65% of the time Faulk ends up better. But that could be way off, I don't know.
I'm bringing up the Norris, because people are saying Noah's ceiling is Scott Neidermayer, who I'd consider in the discussion for top 5 all-time NHL dmen. The point I'm making, is the likelihood of Hanifin being top 5 all-time is so low, that it is irrelevant to the discussion, as I think it's unlikely Hanifin will ever even be the best dman in the league for one season.
Even if there were a 1% chance that Hanifin is the greatest dman of all time, that still wouldn't mean there was a greater than 50% chance that he'll be better than Faulk.
So basically, I'm quibbling needlessly about how an unlikely to be reached "ceiling" is being used to argue who is going to be better. I don't have a lot going on.