Group 1
Forwards
Alexander Ovechkin
Evgeni Malkin
Nikita Kucherov
Defenseman
Sergei Gonchar
Andrei Markov
Goalie
Evgeni Nabokov
Group 2
Ilya Kovalchuk
Sergei Fedorov
Pavel Bure
Defenseman
Sergei Zubov
Vladimir Malakhov
Goalie
Andrei Vasilevski
Group 3
Forwards
Artemi Panarin
Pavel Datsyuk
Alexander Mogilny
Defenseman
Viacheslav Fetisov
Vladimir Konstantinov
Goalie
Vladislav Tretiak
I think a lot of young people on these boards will disregard the third group because they didn't see almost any of them play.
But I think it's 3 if Mogilny is playing at the top of his game.
To me, the clear worst players (and still damn good players) are Malakhov, Nabokov, and probably Markov.
Tretiak was a superstar who held the 77 Canadiens to 3 goals despite being outshot something like 37-13.
Fetisov played in Russia but was basically a Ray Bourque clone without the longevity.
Konstantinov provides such a unique dimension and was really breaking out prior to the tragic limousine accident. Maybe Panarin is the weak point on this line, but he's an incredible distributor and he and Mogilny would be poetry while Datsyuk (also poetry), Fetisov, and Konstantinov would be impossible to keep the puck from.
I love Bure, he's probably why I got into hockey in 94. Fedorov was a favorite too, and Zubov was a legitimate star to super star. But Malakhov was one of the most enigmatic players of the entire decade of the 90's. Fedorov is good defensively and Zubov is , and Vasilevskiy is incredible. But Bure and Kovalchuk are entirely indifferent defensively and so is Malakhov.
Ovie and Malkin have never really thrived together. Kucherov is incredible too, but there's only one puck and all 3 are puck possession players. Gonchar and Markov are fine but don't breathe the same air as Fetisov (and they would tell you this if you asked them I bet) and don't offer the dimension that Konstantinov does.
Nabokov was a good goalie, often a really good goalie, but Tretiak and Vasilevskiy are on different levels.