If Deryk Engelland and Luca Sbisa can gain redemption as legit NHL d-men in Vegas, there has to be hope for Gudbranson in VanCity. I mean as good as those guys have been, surely Gudbranson has a better basic tool-box than either one of them.
I mean, we're all sitting here watching a Cup Finals team wherein essentially
half of their Top-6 is comprised of Brayden McNabb, Deryk Engelland, and Luca Sbisa/Jon Merrill...and we're
certain that a guy like Erik Gudbranson can't be a successful component of a winning NHL blueline in today's game? I have zero doubts he's a better player than the majority of that similarly "typed" group at least.
It seems like an awfully contorted bit of mental gymnastics tbh. But at the same time...i think it's become abundantly clear that you need coaching that
fits with the players you're trying to install.
Somewhere, there's clearly a disconnect. Between what management
want Guddy to be, and what the coaching staff are able to use him as. You have to employ coaches who understand the limitations and abilities of the players you're handing them...and maximize what's there. We haven't had that in a while now, behind the bench.
Meanwhile...i'm supremely confident that you could replace any of Sbisa/Engelland/even McNabb with Gudbranson, and this Vegas team would probably still have similar results.
Coaching and systems are big now. And the more preferences swing in one direction
because analytics...the more "value" guys like Gudbranson can potentially be, if they can be paired up with the right partners and system a la Vegas. The more they can potentially become the "underexploited market" stats nerds love to mine. Though unfortunately we've already paid Guddy above value and all that.