Toggle sidebar

WCQF: (2) Anaheim Ducks vs (3) San Jose Sharks | Sharks Leads Series 3-0

WCQF: (2) Anaheim Ducks vs (3) San Jose Sharks

  • Total voters
    682
Status
Not open for further replies.
Quid Pro Clowe

Quid Pro Clowe

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
52,301
9,174
530
Happy about the wins, but can't say I'm surprised. Sharks played really well at the Honda Center during the regular season, too. That said, I won't be shocked if Anaheim wins both in San Jose, either. Their AHL team played the Sharks tight earlier this year.

Both of these teams can play very good road games. This isn't over by a longshot.

The Perry hit was correctly called. No need for fines/suspension. Him taking more than half the remaining clock off while down a goal was sweet enough. Such an unnecessary hit to make.
 
Crosbyfan

Crosbyfan

Registered User
Nov 27, 2003
12,666
2,489
piteus said:
Regardless, it was an unnecessary risk by Perry. Why even put himself in that position in such a critical part of the game / series? It was a low IQ hockey play.
Click to expand...
No question it was a stupid and unnecessary play...but randomly something the NHL refs might allow...or make it a 4 on 4 or even a Ducks PP after possible retaliation...how was Perry to know the optics might be bad on it? He didn't hit Karlsson toward the boards or know his helmet would come flying off.
 
TomasHertlsRooster

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Crosbyfan said:
No question it was a stupid and unnecessary play...but randomly something the NHL refs might allow...or make it a 4 on 4 or even a Ducks PP after possible retaliation...how was Perry to know the optics might be bad on it? He didn't hit Karlsson toward the boards or know his helmet would come flying off.
Click to expand...

Even if you don't think it was illegal (it was), it was a blatant disregard for another player's safety and a stupid play. He went way out of his way to throw a dangerous hit on a player that wasn't even playing the puck.
 
Crosbyfan

Crosbyfan

Registered User
Nov 27, 2003
12,666
2,489
JoeThorntonsRooster said:
Even if you don't think it was illegal (it was), it was a blatant disregard for another player's safety and a stupid play. He went way out of his way to throw a dangerous hit on a player that wasn't even playing the puck.
Click to expand...
I think it should be illegal, but I see as and more dangerous hits that are allowed and thus encouraged.
 
treefiddy

treefiddy

Errr'day Trollin'
May 8, 2013
3,379
591
San Jose
TrappedInFullerton said:
Everyone talking about the Perry hit, I'm more pissed about this one on Braun by Rakell





The first clip was the live angle. Startled the hell out of me seeing his head suddenly driven into the boards. He bounced right back up, it was a miracle.

https://my.mixtape.moe/wjbquf.mp4 (Better version with sound)
Click to expand...


The fact that this stuff happened multiple times during this game and we haven’t heard a peep from the league speaks louder than any suspension...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SharkAttack86, MartinJonesForPrez and Phu
Limekiller

Limekiller

Registered User
May 16, 2010
3,886
514
SF Bay Area
Like I said in the GDT from last night, the Perry hit looked MUCH worse in real time than it did on replays. I do think it was an illegal hit, and was absolutely an incredibly stupid hit to make at that stage of the game, but 2 minutes was absolutely the right call. I don't think there should be any supplemental discipline, and I would be shocked if he even gets a fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Getz2perry
SirQuacksALot

SirQuacksALot

A Garibaldi in Kelp
Mar 16, 2010
7,622
846
Remember when Perry stole all the money from the cookie sales from all the girl scout troops in San Jose?
 
SirQuacksALot

SirQuacksALot

A Garibaldi in Kelp
Mar 16, 2010
7,622
846
Friday said:
tempter
Click to expand...

screams-internally-27681223.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom