Proposal: Van- NYI Edler for #12 OA

[Shanejones]

The time to trade Edler for any return at all was about 4 years ago....unless you call Pete Chiareli. Then you might get something good lol

Not really, by packing Tanev and Edler, your getting a decent 2nd pairing or break them up and put with youth

 

[Enrico Ciccone]

Not really, by packing Tanev and Edler, your getting a decent 2nd pairing or break them up and put with youth

The original post said nothing of Tanev being a part of it. Obviously if you’re adding to the deal it changes the value. Hell, if you throw in 7ov I’m sure Edler’s value suddenly goes through the roof.

 

[Cogburn]

Rather just go after Demko because that's what the Isles need the most. And no Demko is not worth the 12OA

We have our future in goaltending invested in Demko. He might not be worth it, but we have 0 desire to move him. As in none. As in no realistic return will be enough for us. Markstrom, Nilsson, and even DiPietro are all better targets if you're looking for any kind of goaltender from Vancouver.

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Brutal for the fish

 

[Cogburn]

The original post said nothing of Tanev being a part of it. Obviously if you’re adding to the deal it changes the value. Hell, if you throw in 7ov I’m sure Edler’s value suddenly goes through the roof.

Any inclusion, hypothetically, of Tanev, would have to beat the Leafs, specifically LiferLeafer's, offer of Toronto's 1st, San Jose's 2nd and Toronto's 2019 2nd.

Even the offer of two of the Islanders seconds would be a better return keeping them separate then.

And I firmly believe if we trade one, the other should be off limits too. But that's me.

 

[Shanejones]

The original post said nothing of Tanev being a part of it. Obviously if you’re adding to the deal it changes the value. Hell, if you throw in 7ov I’m sure Edler’s value suddenly goes through the roof.

My bad, I thought you were referring to one of the posts on here

 

[Enrico Ciccone]

My bad, I thought you were referring to one of the posts on here

Haha no worries. I should have read the whole thread

 

[Sergei Shirokov]

From a talent POV I don't think its unreasonable, Edler is a really good player. But he's 32 and has a few miles on him. Its too high a price age considered.

Canucks wouldn't move him for two 2nd's. That's too little and his departure would leave us with 1 top 4 defenseman. It seems more like a mid/late first + prospect kind of deal. I don't see the fit.

 

[DekeyPete]

Thanks for the responses everyone Never know how hard you're going to get shit on in here for suggestions.lol

 

[Newsworthy]

We have our future in goaltending invested in Demko. He might not be worth it, but we have 0 desire to move him. As in none. As in no realistic return will be enough for us. Markstrom, Nilsson, and even DiPietro are all better targets if you're looking for any kind of goaltender from Vancouver.

And why would NY move their picks for unproven goalies like Grubauer or a player like Tanev?
And how old is Edler?
For the most part these trades are being offered by Canucks fans.
Personally I rather keep our picks and just go with a free agent goalie next season. Hopefully draft Skarek and see what Linus becomes. Surely it's not a great option but overpaying for goalies is not the best way either.

 

[Cogburn]

And why would NY move their picks for unproven goalies like Grubauer or a player like Tanev?
And how old is Edler?
For the most part these trades are being offered by Canucks fans.
Personally I rather keep our picks and just go with a free agent goalie next season. Hopefully draft Skarek and see what Linus becomes. Surely it's not a great option but overpaying for goalies is not the best way either.

We can't move Demko for anything aside from a win. I can't say I know the fan alignment of everyone on this board, but in this and another thread we have a number trades involving, in no particular order, Hutton, Edler, Tanev and Demko, and I have to assume at least one or two proposals are on the Islanders side. Keeping the picks are a good way to go, I hope to keep ours, as we need a few more talented D and there are a few available. As for Demko, you're the one saying you'd target him, but wouldn't give up one of your firsts.

 

[Newsworthy]

We can't move Demko for anything aside from a win. I can't say I know the fan alignment of everyone on this board, but in this and another thread we have a number trades involving, in no particular order, Hutton, Edler, Tanev and Demko, and I have to assume at least one or two proposals are on the Islanders side. Keeping the picks are a good way to go, I hope to keep ours, as we need a few more talented D and there are a few available. As for Demko, you're the one saying you'd target him, but wouldn't give up one of your firsts.

True and I don't think Canucks should deal Demko. I think he's a future number 1 and I doubt Benning would even consider it.

 

[Jumptheshark]

Quick and easy proposal. Straight up Edler to NYI, the #12 OA to Van.
Is this fair value? Do both teams do this?
And yes, of course Edler's NMC. But this is the internet, let's discuss.

I will politely say that Edler does not have that high of a value

 

[CREW99AW]

Quick and easy proposal. Straight up Edler to NYI, the #12 OA to Van.
Is this fair value? Do both teams do this?
And yes, of course Edler's NMC. But this is the internet, let's discuss.

No. Do not want Edler for 12OV anymore then I want Tanev for 12th OV.

Flames GM Treveling (sp), was quoted in a sportsnet interview after trying to trade for a 1st. He says the cost is a good, young roster player.
32 yr old Edler, 1 yr from unrestricted free agency,does not even get a conversation started.

 

[Ace of Hades]

How about Tanev and Elder for 12. lol

So Tanev and a random old homeless person for the 12th overall? Okay.

 

[CREW99AW]

Not really, by packing Tanev and Edler, your getting a decent 2nd pairing or break them up and put with youth

Isles will want someone with term.
28 yr old Tanev, 2 yrs from unrestricted free agency and 32 yr old Edler, 1 yr from unrestricted free agency will not land either 11th or 12th overall.

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

Agree to disagree. Still has a good shot on the PP but no where near first round value

Oh no I totally agree on value. I was just pointing out he is better now than he was

 

[eviohh26]

Edler played great hockey last year. If is traded its at trade deadline. And i doubt we get a mid first unless we fleace someone. I'd prefer to keep the guy. Good vet to keep around and its not we got anyone else atm. If Edler is dealt it should be at the TDL.

 

[iFan]

Rather just go after Demko because that's what the Isles need the most. And no Demko is not worth the 12OA

Canucks also need Demko... I’d be upset if we moved Demko for the 12OA, not that he’s worth that pick in a trade but we need a potential star #1 goalie badly and Demko is shaping into that very nicely and nearly ready. Huge mistake to move him.

 

[seafoam]

We all know Edler isn’t waiving.

 

[PetterssonSimp]

I’d for sure trade Eddie for a 10-20th overall first. Doubt he’d ever agree to waive his NTC though. It’s really a battle of futility to even propose for him as he’s continually denied trades out of Vancouver.

 

[Frankie Blueberries]

To be fair I do think Edler is worth a first but from the isles at 12 I don’t think that’s the deal for them. I’d rather re-sign DeHann and keep the first if Edler is the return. I’d rather package the 12th for a bit younger top pair Defensman. I view Edler as a #3/4

Sorry for my original reply. Didn’t mean to come off as a dick

Your original post was spot on lol, no worries.
Yeah you guys could probably target a player like Hanifin or Hamilton with your 1st. Better options to pursue for sure.

 

[Common Court3sy]

Counter proposal: Islanders offer picks #41 (their 2nd) and Calgary's 2nd in 2019

Edit: For Edler

100% would do!