Brent Burns Beard
Powered by Vasiliev Podsloven
- Feb 27, 2002
- 5,575
- 570
i think arbitration should be available to both parties at any time. a team can take an overpaid player to arbitration mid season or mid contract if they want. if the team wins, they win an immediate change in contract but the player has the right to walk away from the award, take a 75% buyout of the newly arbitrated award or sign the deal for his choice of a 1, 2 or 3 year extension.
if a player wins his abritration case, he wins an immediate change in contract. the team has the right to walk away from any arbitration. the teams can be awarded a compensation pick in the entry draft based on some logical model.
well, of course the big markets would steal everyone's players, but you player haters would never see an overpaid player again. even so, im sure if you remove the mid contract/season component and just go with this based on when contracts expire. would it be fair to let any party choose arbitration unlimited amount of times ?
dr
if a player wins his abritration case, he wins an immediate change in contract. the team has the right to walk away from any arbitration. the teams can be awarded a compensation pick in the entry draft based on some logical model.
well, of course the big markets would steal everyone's players, but you player haters would never see an overpaid player again. even so, im sure if you remove the mid contract/season component and just go with this based on when contracts expire. would it be fair to let any party choose arbitration unlimited amount of times ?
dr