Value of: Trocheck or Bjugstad to Calgary

[letsgrowcactus]

Trocheck close to untouchable.

Bjugstad could probably be had for a late 1st/2nd and/or small plus

I don't know, I'm not necessarily against trading Bjugstad but we need players more than picks. Our RW depth is shaky and moving him makes it worse.
If he's moved it's probably in a package for a defensively responsible top4D, or for a top6 RW to a team that sees him at center.

 

[SenzZen]

Calgary would have to give up their 1st and some good prospects if they want Trochek. Oh wait...

In that case...

Trocheck for Hamonic straight up?...

 

[ViktorBaeArvidsson]

In that case...

Trocheck for Hamonic straight up?...

yea perfect g8 deal

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

In that case...

Trocheck for Hamonic straight up?...

Come on....you serious?

 

[SenzZen]

Come on....you serious?

I assumed the guy I quoted was joking and referring to assets they used to acquire Hamonic, so followed through...

 

[SufferingCatFan]

Trocheck close to untouchable.

Bjugstad could probably be had for a late 1st/2nd and/or small plus

You are under- valuing Bjugstad, who rebounded after an injury plagued 2016-17 season, especially in the second half of the 2017-18 season transitioning from center to RW. He scored 19 g with 29 a, was a +5 and exceeded 50% in fow. Signed long term at a reasonable $4 million.