Bjornar Moxnes
Stem Rødt og Felix Unger Sörum
Still think Turris comes in under 6Mil. but should be more then Little as he isn't the Jets 1C, Turris is ours..
Actually Pageau is the tough competition player for the Sens, not Turris.
Still think Turris comes in under 6Mil. but should be more then Little as he isn't the Jets 1C, Turris is ours..
Actually Pageau is the tough competition player for the Sens, not Turris.
Uhm... ok. Shut down center doesn't equal #1 center though. Turris is our #1 center.
Well a Little plays the toughest competition on the Jets and from a point per game pace outscored Turris.
I feel like we need Wideman around for October until Karlsson is healthy. We gotta keep our heads above water and not get 'Blue Jayed' in the first 15 games so the rest of the season is a wash. I'm sure he could be moved around the deadline if needed.
I wouldn't bother with Athanasiou with Boucher as the coach. Neal would be a huge add if we had the assets to part with.
You should just tank for Dahlin. Instant convince Karlsson to stay. If you can't get him, take Boqvist, he's Karlsson lite.
You should just tank for Dahlin. Instant convince Karlsson to stay. If you can't get him, take Boqvist, he's Karlsson lite.
Let him go? For nothing? He's an asset. Why would it be best to just let an asset go, instead of either keeping it or getting something for it?If Turris won't accept 5-5.5mil, then let him go.
Let him go? For nothing?
When Alfie said he doesn't think Ottawa's Ownership was serious about winning I think he meant it. If that's the attitude of most of the players, EK is a goner this summer.
If EK likes Ottawa and wants to stay for family and friends, different story.
But if EK is about winning and getting paid to win, Ottawa won't be on the list of teams he'll extend with. We are a good team, but we're not a team that can be taken seriously by serious talent with this ownership group.
Let him go? For nothing? He's an asset. Why would it be best to just let an asset go, instead of either keeping it or getting something for it?
Sure, you just drive out to the woods and let him find his own way. He'll be unsure at first and might not want to go, but give it a minute and a pack of wild Turrises will eventually come along and he'll remember what it was like to live life in the wild, and he'll run off with his new family, without giving it a second thought.
Then you just get in your car and drive away, but not without first remembering all the good times you had with your Turris, and wiping away that stray tear from your cheek.
Sure, you just drive out to the woods and let him find his own way. He'll be unsure at first and might not want to go, but give it a minute and a pack of wild Turrises will eventually come along and he'll remember what it was like to live life in the wild, and he'll run off with his new family, without giving it a second thought.
Then you just get in your car and drive away, but not without first remembering all the good times you had with your Turris, and wiping away that stray tear from your cheek.
AA or James Neal
get one
I have a feeling Dorion and McPhee aren't really on speaking terms. That's a guess only obviously.
Let him go? For nothing? He's an asset. Why would it be best to just let an asset go, instead of either keeping it or getting something for it?