Top sophomores for this season?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ukyo

Registered User
Mar 2, 2003
1,794
0
Silicon Valley
Visit site
How would you rank the top sophomore performances this season? Not just points or scoring, but in terms of impact.

1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Spezza
4. Cheechoo
5. Zetterberg
6. Weiss
7. Leopold
8. Bouwmeester
9. Arnason
10. Hemsky

Too bad Jackman's injured. I'm sure I've neglected some people (Kotalik? Corvo? Backman?).
 

slimer

Registered User
Jul 8, 2003
469
0
ukyo said:
How would you rank the top sophomore performances this season? Not just points or scoring, but in terms of impact.

1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Spezza
4. Cheechoo
5. Zetterberg
6. Weiss
7. Leopold
8. Bouwmeester
9. Arnason
10. Hemsky

Too bad Jackman's injured. I'm sure I've neglected some people (Kotalik? Corvo? Backman?).
Backman is a rookie.
 

Carbonneau

Registered User
Jan 31, 2003
2,132
0
Nova Scotia
Visit site
ukyo said:
How would you rank the top sophomore performances this season? Not just points or scoring, but in terms of impact.

1. Nash
2. Spezza
3. Cheechoo
4. Frolov
5. Zetterberg
6. Bouwmeester
7. Leopold
8. Weiss
9. Arnason
10. Hemsky

Just a couple changes in my opinon .
 

ukyo

Registered User
Mar 2, 2003
1,794
0
Silicon Valley
Visit site
Carbonneau said:
1. Nash
2. Spezza
3. Cheechoo
4. Frolov
5. Zetterberg
6. Bouwmeester
7. Leopold
8. Weiss
9. Arnason
10. Hemsky

Just a couple changes in my opinon .

Out of curiosity, what's your rationale on putting Frolov below Spezza and Cheechoo? Especially Cheechoo... I thought I had him kind of high.
 
Last edited:

rinkrat13

Registered User
Nov 27, 2003
1,145
0
Toronto
ukyo said:
How would you rank the top sophomore performances this season? Not just points or scoring, but in terms of impact.

1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Spezza
4. Cheechoo
5. Zetterberg
6. Weiss
7. Leopold
8. Bouwmeester
9. Arnason
10. Hemsky

Too bad Jackman's injured. I'm sure I've neglected some people (Kotalik? Corvo? Backman?).

1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Zetterberg
4. Spezza
5. Cheechoo
6. Leopold
7. Weiss
8. Boumeester
9. Kotalik
10.Hemsky
 

Sting

Registered User
Feb 8, 2004
7,912
2,908
rinkrat13 said:
1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Zetterberg
4. Spezza
5. Cheechoo
6. Leopold
7. Weiss
8. Boumeester
9. Kotalik
10.Hemsky

Spezza should be higher than Zetterberg and Frolov...imo he's been pretty damn good for his first "real" year.
 

Carbonneau

Registered User
Jan 31, 2003
2,132
0
Nova Scotia
Visit site
ukyo said:
Out of curiosity, what's your rationale on putting Frolov below Spezza and Cheechoo? Especially Cheechoo... I thought I had him kind of high.

Sorry man for the long wait to reply....I feel Spezza is the real deal, Frolov is better defensively, but Spezza is better ofensively.

As for Cheechoo, the guy had less around him this season and has had a great breakout season. Cheechoo and Frolov are probably equal right now.

I just think Frolov wouldn't have progressed as quickly if the team had been healthy the past 2 years. Of course, with more talent around him, he could be even better than he is right now, but maybe he doesn't get the same ice time.

Anyways, Frolov, is going to be a great player and if LA ever gets healthy, they would be scary.
 

#44_delivers

Registered User
Dec 21, 2003
3,009
0
edmonton
1. Nash
2. Frolov
3. Zetterberg
4. Spezza
5. Cheechoo
6. Leopold
7. Weiss
8. kotalik
9. Boumeester
10.Hemsky

this list is as close as it gets imho

theres no way in hell spezza should be above frolov and zetterberg.
 

Scottkmlps

Registered User
Aug 25, 2003
13,622
1,355
Ladysmith, BC
Visit site
Carbonneau said:
I just think Frolov wouldn't have progressed as quickly if the team had been healthy the past 2 years. Of course, with more talent around him, he could be even better than he is right now, but maybe he doesn't get the same ice time.

Playing on a line with Stumpel and Palffy (that was a planned line before the season started, but with Deadmarsh and Allison not starting the season that got thrown out the window), he would've progressed quicker than he has in my opinion.
You look at Spezza, a great young player, not taking that away from him, he's had Hossa, Smolinski, Havlat, etc., etc., as linemates. Frolov has picked up 20 goals playing with Stumpel and ____________ (insert name here). Usually a rookie like Scott Barney, John Tripp, and Cammy (technically not a rookie) have played with Stumpel and Frolov. With that, I would put Frolov ahead of Spezza.
 

PigPen

Registered User
Jun 25, 2003
1,832
0
Detroit
Visit site
1. Nash
2. Zetterberg
3. Frolov
4. Spezza
5. Cheechoo
6. Leopold
7. Weiss
8. kotalik
9. Boumeester
10.Hemsky

Despite Zetterberg's injury he's only 8 points behind frolov (in 21 fewer games) and 12 behind Spezza (in 19 fewer). He has something like 14 points in his last 12 games. He's played exceptionally defensively and carries his line offensively. Were it not for that broken leg he'd be on a 63 point pace, which is higher than any other sophmore player as well.

I give Rick Nash the nod as the best because he's his team's only real scoring threat this year and people focus in on him much more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad