HC Bienne
@llopesso19
when the top prospects get to play for the big teams in SHL(for exemple Oliver Kylington) , what do they have to give in exchange? money? players? is almost unique in worlds hockey and seems to work very well.
when the top prospects get to play for the big teams in SHL(for exemple Oliver Kylington) , what do they have to give in exchange? money? players? is almost unique in worlds hockey and seems to work very well.
Icing, Kylington doesn't belong to Färjestad. I'd wager he's got a utvecklingskontrakt or something similar with them, but he doesn't belong to anybody. Sweden isn't North America.
Icing, Kylington doesn't belong to Färjestad. I'd wager he's got a utvecklingskontrakt or something similar with them, but he doesn't belong to anybody. Sweden isn't North America.
What do you mean? Kylington belongs to Färjestad. Should Färjestad pay them self, or give a player in exchange to themselfes?
If you are speaking of "transfers" between clubs a guy like Kylington is young and is not contracted like a senior professional player. He went to Karlstad (Färjestad home town) to get his hockey education in their hockey academy.
No, I didn't. But you two don't understand what I wrote. There's a difference between having a contract with a team and a team owning your righs. All players in Sweden are free agents. That was my point, Kylington doesn't belong to Färjestad because we don't have that kind of system in Sweden.
Icing, the thing is that Kylington can do exactly that if he wants to. However it will mean a breach of contract and he most likely will lose some money in the process. But in a "beloning to" scenario he is not free to choose where he plays. It's not splitting hairs, it's a huge difference in market principles.