crossxcheck
Registered User
waffledave said:Sportsnet says the counter offer included a soft cap of 54% of revenues to go to player salaries.
that's sounds about right. not their best offer, though. still plenty more negotiations left.
waffledave said:Sportsnet says the counter offer included a soft cap of 54% of revenues to go to player salaries.
Son of Steinbrenner said:if somebody offered you the money the players make you would take it.
who screwed the game up. the players?????????X8oD said:not if they told me, the result would be in a year you wont have a job, and will be back making $100 a game if your lucky.
that seems to be the issue i have with the players stance. Everything they say and do ends up boiling down to 1 idea... We dont care how screwed up the NHL is, as long as we get paid.
Son of Steinbrenner said:there doesn't have to be a linkage between revenues and player costs. name a business in this world that has cost certanity.
X8oD said:not if they told me, the result would be in a year you wont have a job, and will be back making $100 a game if your lucky.
that seems to be the issue i have with the players stance. Everything they say and do ends up boiling down to 1 idea... We dont care how screwed up the NHL is, as long as we get paid.
Leafer4Life said:Thanks, Bettman.......... Bah Humbug
neelynugs said:ummm...what did he say?
Son of Steinbrenner said:there doesn't have to be a linkage between revenues and player costs. name a business in this world that has cost certanity.
Name a business in this world that depends on the strength of all competitors to be successful.Son of Steinbrenner said:there doesn't have to be a linkage between revenues and player costs. name a business in this world that has cost certanity.
Son of Steinbrenner said:the owners are the guys that gave these guys the contracts
slats432 said:Name a business in this world that depends on the strength of all competitors to be successful.
Benji Frank said:So someone offers you the winning 6/49 ticket and tells you a year form now instead of getting another winning 6/49 you're going to only get a scratch and win with 3 different coloured 7's on it, you're goin to turn it down and settle for 5 out of 6 plus the bonus for 4 or 5 years instead???
Sure you are....
Digger12 said:-Same 24% rollback, but lower percentages for low salary guys and higher percentages for high salary guys
-Get rid of bonuses altogether for rookie contracts
-Totally shot down luxury tax proposal
-NOT seeking the elimination of guaranteed contracts
-Agreed a structure where median salary remains unchanged
-Raise min salary to 300k
-Liberalizing UFA status (possibility of lowering age)
-Team player costs from 38.6 to 44.6 million/yr, negotiable (may have heard the 44.6 number wrong)
And let's not forget: All this was uncharted territory for everyone. Salaries have never been so high. Who knew it would grow so fast, and who knew at what point the system would fall apart? It's been a test run of sorts.Vlad The Impaler said:That is a lie.
Contracts are negotiated by both parties. The players and their cockroache-agents work very hard to get these contracts.
Huh? I'm not sure what you're watching, but back here on Planet Earth, Bettman's doing very well for himself, after making a very fair proposal.FLYLine4LIFE said:The media is RIPPING GARY APART!