Rufus
Letangarang
- May 27, 2014
- 1,929
- 18
Amazing that you already know that we lost the tradeI don't mind losing a trade...but for Sheahan? That hurts....
Amazing that you already know that we lost the tradeI don't mind losing a trade...but for Sheahan? That hurts....
Wilson might not have been anything special but he is better than Sheahan and also better than Kuhnhackl. We should have been able to get this guy for much less... Or preferably not traded for him at all
You literally hate everything soWe've been money with 3rd round picks...hate this deal.
Was Bonino really much different? He was a pretty damn vanilla shot-blocking defensive 3C the vast majority of the time.The problem I have with this trade is it seems like our bottom six is moving back into the vanilla meh it was during the late Bylsma era up until Sullivan.
The problem I have with this trade is it seems like our bottom six is moving back into the vanilla meh it was during the late Bylsma era up until Sullivan.
You literally hate everything so
Was Bonino really much different? He was a pretty damn vanilla shot-blocking defensive 3C the vast majority of the time.
Between Hags, Sheary, Rust, and Horny, 2 of those guys are in our bottom 6. Kegger is exactly what you're asking for I think too, though obviously he's not as good as Cullen. Reaves does different things, but he's actually also a guy who fits that description of doing one or two things very well. So long as it's Rowney or Kuhn sitting, I don't see how this does anything worse than maybe upgrade one vanilla player with a better one.It isn't so much about Bonino and Sheahan for me as the general trend. Bonino really wasn't the biggest loss. As you said, he's a pretty vanilla defensive 3C.
Cullen was great at driving possession and was slick in transition when given space. McKegg was a pleasant addition because he brings good speed. Its more of a personal preference in roster construction for me. I would rather have bottom sixers (mostly talking fourth liners and third wheel on the third line) who do one or two things well and have holes in their game than the more traditional bottom sixers that just eat up minutes every night.
All that being said, Sheahan is at worst still an upgrade on Rowney, and Wilson was getting lost in the winger log jam anyway, so its a small complaint.
Between Hags, Sheary, Rust, and Horny, 2 of those guys are in our bottom 6. Kegger is exactly what you're asking for I think too, though obviously he's not as good as Cullen. Reaves does different things, but he's actually also a guy who fits that description of doing one or two things very well. So long as it's Rowney or Kuhn sitting, I don't see how this does anything worse than maybe upgrade one vanilla player with a better one.
if we sit Kegger instead of Kuhn or Rowney, I will join the side of being annoyed with the direction of the bottom 6Agreed on Kegger and Reaves. Rowney and Kuhn were the two I was mostly worried about with the "vanilla trend", but even if injuries strike (and with this team it's inevitable) if they are long term its most likely Sprong or ZAR than one of those two stopgapping. Probably an initial overreaction on my part. I still have PTSD of Gladams-Vitale and Sutter-Spaling.
Let's continue to look for a legitimate 3C and move on from Sheahan. We have plenty of centers that can't score on this team. He doesn't help us...at all.
He'd be more useless than Reaves on this squad. The fascination with him around here is soooo odd. Again, I understand if you liked him in the summer before McKegg came. But he'd be so redundant now.
This board is going to be piiiiiiisssseeeddd lol
The problem I have with this trade is it seems like our bottom six is moving back into the vanilla meh it was during the late Bylsma era up until Sullivan.
So are we having the "we need a new backup" conversation now? I feel like that area is starting to look troubling.
Again, just call up Tristan Jarry. Do people forget the Penguins have him or something?
He hasn't looked good in the A. Under 900 save percentage