The Legacy of Ken Holland

SpookyTsuki

Registered User
Dec 3, 2014
15,916
671
Poile has always been good finding defencmen. Also at his Washington days.

Holland has turned our drafting nicely around letting Jim Nill and Joe McDonell walk and aquiring Tyler Wright. Phenomenal difference since day 1.

Our North American drafting/developing was abysmal under Nill's tenure. All current core is basicly HÃ¥kan Andersson's European steals from last 2 decades.

Now Wright has changed all and NA looks to be again our strong area. At least for forwards. Tough to say about defencemen yet. It takes so much time.

Nill isnt as good at drafting as some like to believe. The European scouts really are the heart and soul of this team.

Holland is doing good right now at finding up and coming scouts (that one cbj scout, Idk if hes here anymore though) and pretty much what you said.
 

Say Hey Kid

Under the Sign of the Black Mark
Dec 10, 2007
23,789
5,587
Bathory
Most of the years posted so far in the OP (up to year 17) look anywhere from "Hey, that's a pretty nice season, all things considered!" to "Oh my God I love you Ken Holland!!!" ...
Agreed. My dad grew up in the Detroit area and has been a fan since the 30s. I agree with him that all true Wings fans love Holland.
 

SimplySolace

"We like our team"
Jun 30, 2013
3,120
43
Agreed. My dad grew up in the Detroit area and has been a fan since the 30s. I agree with him that all true Wings fans love Holland.

"All true Wings fans" :laugh: or maybe those that don't have their eyes open to see the past 5 years or so have been mediocre at best.
 

SpookyTsuki

Registered User
Dec 3, 2014
15,916
671
Just because a person brings back glory to a team doesn't mean he has not done a bad job recently.
 

Claypool

Registered User
Jan 12, 2009
13,670
4,352
And then make a list of his transactions that ended up being also bad

The only really bad one was Weiss, and he was always injured. I'll also throw the Quincy trade in there since he never replicated his offensive potential.
 

PullHard

Jul 18, 2007
28,394
2,470
The only really bad one was Weiss, and he was always injured. I'll also throw the Quincy trade in there since he never replicated his offensive potential.

Weiss was great IMO

Holland actually kind of took a chance and got what in theory should have been a 1B/ elite 2C, I don't fault him for signing a guy who immediately turned into glass

Quincey deserves more than a "throw in" status mention, that trade was terrible the day it was made
 

InjuredChoker

Registered User
Dec 25, 2011
31,402
345
LTIR or golf course
weiss signing turned out very bad but i liked it at the time quite a bit. of course it's risky to sign around 30yr old forward who hadn't been healthy on the ice for more than a year, had fairly significant injury history and history of paying through those injuries... and then he got injured early on and tried to play through it.
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,696
3,418
Franzen was a beast. So holland flipped a coin

Always, always, always go with the skilled two-way player in the face of signing a pseudo-power forward. Choosing Franzen over Hossa was a huge mistake without hindsight. One guy was, at his best, a 60 point forward with a short track record. The other guy was, at his worst, a 60 point forward with an elite, safe track record. That was Holland's first mistake.

Holland's second mistake was thinking he had to choose between the two in the first place. Holland could've picked up an easy $5M by trading Filppula and passing on one of Bertuzzi/Williams and a depth player. Then the conversation becomes Hossa versus Filppula/Williams/Lilja. And that is exactly the type of move that has kept Chicago in the elite. Get your core players, supplement expensive secondaries with reclamation projects or depth guys, and add some talent at the deadline when the player costs 20% of their regular price.

Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Hossa
Cleary(still a 40 point guy)- Zetterberg - Franzen
Bertuzzi(still a 45 point guy) - Helm - Abbdelkader/Leino
Maltby - Draper - Eaves
May/Maltby

Lidstrom-Rafalski
Kronwall-Stuart
Ericsson-Lebda
Meech

Howard
Osgood

Imagine trading Filppula for two 2nd round picks or something similar then basically replacing him at the deadline with Stempniak (48 points that year - traded for a depth player, a 4th, and a 7th), Ponikarovksy (50 points - traded for salaried roster depth + B prospect), Matt Cullen (48 points - traded for 2nd and a B prospect). Those are just the guys who were actually traded at the time.
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,696
3,418
And then make a list of his transactions that ended up being also bad

The only really bad one was Weiss, and he was always injured. I'll also throw the Quincy trade in there since he never replicated his offensive potential.

Wait...transactions since when?

Jason Williams part 2, Colaiacovo, White, Bertuzzi part 2, Samuelsson part 2, Tootoo, Weiss, Ericsson, Howard, Quincey...
 

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
8,508
2,957
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
I love Ken Holland from 1997-2009. That Ken Holland ruled. Ken Holland from 2009-2015 leaves me with a lukewarm feeling.

Salary cap era + no 1st or 2dn overall picks can do that to the best of GMs. As proven with Ken Holland.

Besides Detroit, Boston is the only team that has won the cup that didn't draft 1st or 2nd overall, but did steal Tyler Seguin who helped them win a cup. And had the hottest goalie in the NHL playoffs since Giguere's pads.

Since then, Boston failed to make the post season last season and possibly again tis season.
 

Dotter

THE ATHLETIC IS GARBAGE
Jul 2, 2014
8,508
2,957
Imprisonment, TN
goo.gl
Always, always, always go with the skilled two-way player in the face of signing a pseudo-power forward. Choosing Franzen over Hossa was a huge mistake without hindsight. One guy was, at his best, a 60 point forward with a short track record. The other guy was, at his worst, a 60 point forward with an elite, safe track record. That was Holland's first mistake.

Holland's second mistake was thinking he had to choose between the two in the first place. Holland could've picked up an easy $5M by trading Filppula and passing on one of Bertuzzi/Williams and a depth player. Then the conversation becomes Hossa versus Filppula/Williams/Lilja. And that is exactly the type of move that has kept Chicago in the elite. Get your core players, supplement expensive secondaries with reclamation projects or depth guys, and add some talent at the deadline when the player costs 20% of their regular price.

Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Hossa
Cleary(still a 40 point guy)- Zetterberg - Franzen
Bertuzzi(still a 45 point guy) - Helm - Abbdelkader/Leino
Maltby - Draper - Eaves
May/Maltby

Lidstrom-Rafalski
Kronwall-Stuart
Ericsson-Lebda
Meech

Howard
Osgood

Imagine trading Filppula for two 2nd round picks or something similar then basically replacing him at the deadline with Stempniak (48 points that year - traded for a depth player, a 4th, and a 7th), Ponikarovksy (50 points - traded for salaried roster depth + B prospect), Matt Cullen (48 points - traded for 2nd and a B prospect). Those are just the guys who were actually traded at the time.

So you were wanting Ken Holland to sign even more cap circumvented contracts? How nice!

People blame Kenny for signing too many cap circumvention contracts (not sure if you were one attacking Kenny for this), but you wanted him to sign more??? :laugh:

Two is enuff, thank you. :help:
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,696
3,418
So you were wanting Ken Holland to sign even more cap circumvented contracts? How nice!

People blame Kenny for signing too many cap circumvention contracts (not sure if you were one attacking Kenny for this), but you wanted him to sign more??? :laugh:

Two is enuff, thank you. :help:

To have better chances at more Cups? Absolutely. One more cap circumventing deal down the line when the ship is sprouting holes isn't going to make any difference.
 

Reddwit

Registered User
Feb 4, 2016
7,696
3,418
Agreed. My dad grew up in the Detroit area and has been a fan since the 30s. I agree with him that all true Wings fans love Holland.

Uhh wtf? Holland isn't a machine. He didn't just reach peak GMing and never falter. The rules of the game changed with the salary cap and then he averaged out. Nothing special anymore. It's no different than Zetterberg or Lidstrom losing several steps. Are we not true fans because we recognize when a member of the organization is no longer elite? What a crock. I could just as easily say that being so invested in a team that you are aware of all the intricacies of their transactions, and therefore can ferret out the mistakes, makes you a "true" fan, whatever that means.
 

SpookyTsuki

Registered User
Dec 3, 2014
15,916
671
Always, always, always go with the skilled two-way player in the face of signing a pseudo-power forward. Choosing Franzen over Hossa was a huge mistake without hindsight. One guy was, at his best, a 60 point forward with a short track record. The other guy was, at his worst, a 60 point forward with an elite, safe track record. That was Holland's first mistake.

Holland's second mistake was thinking he had to choose between the two in the first place. Holland could've picked up an easy $5M by trading Filppula and passing on one of Bertuzzi/Williams and a depth player. Then the conversation becomes Hossa versus Filppula/Williams/Lilja. And that is exactly the type of move that has kept Chicago in the elite. Get your core players, supplement expensive secondaries with reclamation projects or depth guys, and add some talent at the deadline when the player costs 20% of their regular price.

Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Hossa
Cleary(still a 40 point guy)- Zetterberg - Franzen
Bertuzzi(still a 45 point guy) - Helm - Abbdelkader/Leino
Maltby - Draper - Eaves
May/Maltby

Lidstrom-Rafalski
Kronwall-Stuart
Ericsson-Lebda
Meech

Howard
Osgood

Imagine trading Filppula for two 2nd round picks or something similar then basically replacing him at the deadline with Stempniak (48 points that year - traded for a depth player, a 4th, and a 7th), Ponikarovksy (50 points - traded for salaried roster depth + B prospect), Matt Cullen (48 points - traded for 2nd and a B prospect). Those are just the guys who were actually traded at the time.

I don't know what the cap was. But I'm pretty sure that wouldn't fit
 

Zetterberg4Captain

Registered User
Aug 11, 2009
13,781
2,163
Detroit
how come holland gets praised for finding guys like zetterberg and datsyuk or being allowed to outspend everyone else pre-cap world and almost "buy" a stanley cup in 2002 but any and all mistakes or miscalculations made in the past 6 or 7 years are chalked up as being outside his control

i mean if you get praised for zetterberg and labeled a genius why not be labeled a dimwit for missing on subban or keith or weber?

how can it possibly be one and not the other, if it is, then the opinion is clearly just biased

KH did a great job unearthing extreme talent in the late 1990s thru early 2000s and was also very aggressive in obtaining the types of players we need(veterans, hard nosed guys, smart players, fast, strong, etc) but has not been that same GM
 

SpookyTsuki

Registered User
Dec 3, 2014
15,916
671
how come holland gets praised for finding guys like zetterberg and datsyuk or being allowed to outspend everyone else pre-cap world and almost "buy" a stanley cup in 2002 but any and all mistakes or miscalculations made in the past 6 or 7 years are chalked up as being outside his control

i mean if you get praised for zetterberg and labeled a genius why not be labeled a dimwit for missing on subban or keith or weber?

how can it possibly be one and not the other, if it is, then the opinion is clearly just biased

KH did a great job unearthing extreme talent in the late 1990s thru early 2000s and was also very aggressive in obtaining the types of players we need(veterans, hard nosed guys, smart players, fast, strong, etc) but has not been that same GM

You do realize every gm is the same right. People praise the good ones. And don't hate on him if he misses a subban

Hell people praise Gms for picking the Connor mcdavid 1st overall
 

Zetterberg4Captain

Registered User
Aug 11, 2009
13,781
2,163
Detroit
You do realize every gm is the same right. People praise the good ones. And don't hate on him if he misses a subban

Hell people praise Gms for picking the Connor mcdavid 1st overall

the GM's people praise are GM's who more than likely have been among the best of their peers lately, not a decade or two ago

MOD

a GM should be judged on his whole body of work, not just praising the good and ignoring or excusing the bad
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,158
1,576
Salary cap era + no 1st or 2dn overall picks can do that to the best of GMs. As proven with Ken Holland.

Besides Detroit, Boston is the only team that has won the cup that didn't draft 1st or 2nd overall, but did steal Tyler Seguin who helped them win a cup. And had the hottest goalie in the NHL playoffs since Giguere's pads.

Since then, Boston failed to make the post season last season and possibly again tis season.

Thank you for summarizing that pretty well. So tired of the Boston argument for not needing to rebuild through the draft. I go the route of Chicago, Pitts, LA 6000 times out of 10 before trying the Boston route. And before you say Edmonton I say Toronto Calgary, NYR. All teams that have a recent or semi-recent history of abysmal mediocrity trying to "Free Agent" their way to success.

Boston was also a true story of "Anything can happen in the playoffs" put Chara in front of the hottest goalie to arrive since Gigure and its gonna be a world beater. Tim Tomas was a completely random outlier in the equation of skipping the draft to the cup.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,225
14,726
Do you think our grand kids will debate Franzen vs Hossa on here?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->