Darling is a good goalie, but the Hawks definitely made the right choice there.
Darling just let in the softest of the soft, goal. That'll make some folks happy.
Darling gives up 6 goals on 27 shots tonight
Its probably time for Canes to go with Ward for a while
People absolutely do want Darling to fail. Just like some people absolutely wanted Crow to implode. Not everyone who preferred one to the other is guilty of what I'm saying.
But being proven correct on the internet is very important to some people.
Darling gives up 6 goals on 27 shots tonight
Its probably time for Canes to go with Ward for a while
Mixed bag when it comes to Blackhawks Southeast
- TT leading Canes in scoring (8 goals + 12 assists in 20 games) and on pace for 82 pt season
- TVR has established himself as reliable vet on Canes 3rd pairing
- Kruger has been average overall
- Nordstrom is struggling this year
- Dahlbeck looked awful in limited games and his NHL career appears likely to end after this season unless he takes two way deal somewhere
- Darling has .900 sv pct and has been terrible several times for Canes this year
TVR was another sacrifice that this team had to make because of Stan’s stupidity, only a moron would give Kruger that kind of a contract lol
TVR
Danault
TT
Panarin
Hammer
Etc.
This team would have been contending now but we are a fringe Playoff team so let’s all hold hands and be happy because the team won in 2015
Some people are freaking stupid.Sure, but some people would point to Darling's failures as further evidence of just how much smarter they are.
You're operating in shades of grey. Some people much prefer black and white.
...So they're just like the Blackhawks, except their team D/Puck possession lets 5 fewer shots on net per game than the 'hawks do as of right meow... and how did that work out? I'll tell you: Ward started vs Leafs last night but was pulled after letting in 4 goals in period 2.
No question that Darling can be better, and I think he will be, but Canes are beyond brutal defensively often leaving whoever is in the nets on their own back there.
That was my thought as well, but don't want to be accused of hoping for Darling to fail....So they're just like the Blackhawks, except their team D/Puck possession lets 5 fewer shots on net per game than the 'hawks do as of right meow.
The cynical <child of unwed parents> side of me will state that this is a message board, so take everything with a rather large lump of salt considering the source...of the comments. After all, hyperbole is rampant here for all sides of any debate.That was my thought as well, but don't want to be accused of hoping for Darling to fail.
Apparently Blackhawks wants on that list.The current count for people that think TVR was a significant loss for the Blackhawks stands at 2.
1) BWC
2) Brian Hedger
Good company, that. Who else wants on the list? Don't be shy.
this, i agree. as i said last yr, there is not enuf time to see Darling as a starter let alone a team in contention.Some people are freaking stupid.
Seriously, in Darling's case he's a guy you want to see succeed. By the time his deal's up, I don't see any reason he can't be a starter-average of .915.
But that goal was like epic, epic fail.
The current count for people that think TVR was a significant loss for the Blackhawks stands at 2.
1) BWC
2) Brian Hedger
Good company, that. Who else wants on the list? Don't be shy.