JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,020
- 9,228
Darling having a monster game and Teuvo with his first AND second against Edmonton tonight.
Is he?
That is what the gamecast says. I have not watched the game tonight and only had looked at stats randomly. Is it wrong?
I am confident Darling's numbers will normalize and I hope he does well, but so far this year I'm glad we got Dr. Craw.Scotty doesn't have great numbers to this point. So, not entirely shocked.
I have him and Corey as my two goalies on one of my fantasy teams. Pretty interesting
Are you rooting against Darling? I don't get it.
You've said this before and it sounds good on paper, but ......Teuvo Danault and Panarin all hurt pretty bad, to think that all could have been with the Hawks if a couple stupid moves were not made really stings, imagine this team with those players right now, and guess what it would fit under the cap...
You've said this before and it sounds good on paper, but ......
I agree about Danault. Bad trade .... and I would have preferred that SB give TT another year to prove himself but the fact is TT was a disappointment here.
As for Panarin. If he was still here, Saad wouldn't . .. and AP will be getting a big raise after this season (which Hawks couldn't pay out) while Saad is locked in. Don't forget that.
How posters here don't actively use the "ignore poster" feature here is beyond me. Plus with the new site update you can't see 1) that they've posted and 2) that people are quoting their posts like you annoyingly could before.
I can't think of any other reason why you people that are bickering with them are doing it other than because you enjoy doing it.
You can literally make it so they don't exist on your HF experience. Just do it already
You've said this before and it sounds good on paper, but ......
I agree about Danault. Bad trade .... and I would have preferred that SB give TT another year to prove himself but the fact is TT was a disappointment here.
As for Panarin. If he was still here, Saad wouldn't . .. and AP will be getting a big raise after this season (which Hawks couldn't pay out) while Saad is locked in. Don't forget that.
I haven't fully acclimated to the new boards yet, but I usually kept them visible for comedy purposes. It always makes me laugh when someone pops off about something they know nothing about and makes ridiculous statements sitting in their parents basement wearing a "sweat-stained" a-neck T-shirt--and having nothing to back their assertions up.How posters here don't actively use the "ignore poster" feature here is beyond me. Plus with the new site update you can't see 1) that they've posted and 2) that people are quoting their posts like you annoyingly could before.
I can't think of any other reason why you people that are bickering with them are doing it other than because you enjoy doing it.
You can literally make it so they don't exist on your HF experience. Just do it already
Hawks could have had both Saad + Panarin if they decided to dump Seabrook instead of Saad
Should have traded Seabrook like people were advocating instead of signing him longerm
Hawks could have had both Saad + Panarin if they decided to dump Seabrook instead of Saad
Should have traded Seabrook like people were advocating instead of signing him longerm
Seab's term was given to keep his cap hit lower. He would've had a higher cap as a UFA and that was a bargaining chip for him
Yep, they (Seabs and agent) saw Stan coming alright.
SB has value that even i can see. i am still on the idea of have 2 gm's, pretty much like the nba. for chi, SB will be in charge of draft and international scouting. the other will be in charge of players contracts and trades.So what is it for you, Stan moves Seabs or we move Stan out and find someone who can?