The four or more post-season all-star criteria will soon have another member: Rob Blake. Blake has four, and he's not getting in. (IMO, he's about the same as Randy Carlyle, and I don't hear any clamouring from even Carlyle's most ardent supporters). Neely had four, was a better player than Selanne, and look how long it took Neely to get in.
All-star games are the bastian of irrelevance. I don't think I've ever heard of anyone saying "he played in at least 10 all-star games" as the distinction that elevated a player to the HHOF.
We're going to see a lot of players who are going to set new standards for HHOF. 1,300 or even 1,400 points won't be enough for Turgeon, Sundin, Recchi or Andreychuk. Ciccarelli will set a new standard for goals. (Sorry, Dino fans, but he isn't getting inducted). Turgeon's not getting in with 500 goals, and other players who are approaching 500 (Bondra, Roenick, Sundin, Recchi, Mogilny, Modano) won't get in, either. (Bondra also led the league in goals twice).
What category do I need? Playoff performance. Bottom line. Selanne doesn't have it. He has never carried his team on his back when it mattered most. He doesn't have a career-defining playoff, or even a really strong playoff. He never stepped his play up from the regular season to the playoffs. (Something that pretty much everyone in the HHOF did at some point in their career. Dionne, again, is the exception). Yes, Selanne was on some mediocre teams, but the reality is he could not produce. A lot of guys in the HHOF have played on a lot of mediocre teams, but still produced in the most important season, the post-season. That is why, regardless of the stats or the evaluation system that you throw out there, Teemu Selanne will not get in.