Dipsy Doodle
Rent A Barn
- May 28, 2006
- 76,562
- 21,101
Again, too many flaws in your comment.
If your saying a generational talent wins multiple scoring titles, and Crosby hasnt, then that must mean he isnt a generational talent.
Both Ovechkin and Crosby and super-humans on the ice, and they make defensemen look silly, ask hockey players, and please, watch Ovechkin play, as I think you have only watched Crosby play.
Ovechkin is probably top 3 in making the opposing defensemen look silly, and he is hard to contain. Ask Pronger and Beauchemin.
What DONT YOU UNDERSTAND? Both Ovechkin and Crosby are generational talents.
Generational player or Generational talent is when a majority of groups of people feel that from the performance of a certain player in previous years can be translated well into the future, but even better. In this case, hockey analysts, people, and players feel from the 1st season both of Crosby and Ovechkin they are generational talents, because both had seasons that only great ones had in their beginnings. Again this points to Crosby and Ovechkin.
Exceptional players are Malkin, Sakic, Sundin, etc, because they did not have as amazing or as outstanding as the first seasons both Ovechkin and Crosby had, and thus, would always be thought of as "exceptional players," which Ovechkin and Crosby arnt.
For the Bure arguement, HOW THE ****ING HELL do you know if Ovechkin might win the Art Ross or not, thats like me saying Wade Belak would be a Norris Trophy winner 6 times in his career.
Also, tell me what your "extraterrestial" crystal ball says of the future of Nintendo.
And for you to not agree with these statements, it must mean that you are a homer and have personal issues with Ovechkin.
Sigged.