Proposal: Tanev + Baerstchi for Marner

[Tom sestito]

Tanev alone isn't enough to get Marner, but it isn't drastically far off. Baerstchi isn't on the same pedigree as Marner, but he will likely top out as a 45 point middle 6 player, which replaces some of the offense that Marner will produce.

Click to read more...

 

[Dabeast]

This will go well

 

[firstemperor]

It's pretty drastically far off. Tanev isn't anywhere close to the value of Marner.

The Bozak line has been garbage defensively and someone has to be the scapegoat. Babcock's not going to screw over JVR/Bozak, long-time veterans of the team in their contract year. Otherwise, who the hell would want to play here? It sends a message that they all need to be better.

No different than Nylander last year. Except Babcock is harder on the young guys and has always acknowledged different players have different expectations.

No interest in Baertschi either. Let's just hope this thread quietly goes to waste before it goes downhill.

 

[Apotheosis]

Tanev has nowhere near the value of a Marner. That addition doesn't help it either.

 

[Marshy]

Not even for two Tanevs.

 

[nuckfan insk]

No thanks from this Canuck fan

 

[Nylanderthal]

No thanks from this Canuck fan

Thank goodness, lock er up!

 

[RebuildinVan]

No thanks from this Canuck fan

I dont know how you can say that....this team is dull as s**t to watch. Make it happen Jim

 

[Smeagoal]

As much as I love Tanev, this is not close.

Marner has put up tremendous points, is still very young and should become a great forward for years to come. Vancouver doesn't have a young top-4 Dman who is projected to become a top-2 D man currently playing in the NHL. That is what it would take to acquire a player such as this.

Lock'er up

 

[DJN21]

This is embarassing bad for the leafs.

 

[vancityluongo]

Marner would get killed in the big bad Western Conference

 

[Phion Keneuf]

Remove Baertschi, add Horvat.

Leafs will also toss in Carrick

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

Ugh no. Sorry Leaf fans, most of us realize this isn't close.

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

Remove Baertschi, add Horvat.

Leafs will also toss in Carrick

OP is very bad, but Tanev and Horvat for Marner and Carrick isn't happening either. Horvat flat out isn't available for a plethora of reasons.

 

[zeke]

nothing on the canucks gets you Marner.

 

[Puckstuff]

No combination from Vancouver gets you a player like Marner

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

nothing on the canucks gets you Marner.

Nothing individually yes.

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

No combination from Vancouver get's you Marner

Oh really? Boeser, Horvat, Tanev and a first doesn't get you Marner lol?

 

[Puckstuff]

Oh really? Boeser, Horvat, Tanev and a first doesn't get you Marner lol?

Toronto is going for a cup. Kapanen can't even get on the roster because of our young stars. Boeser would literally be waiting 3-4 years before he gets a look. We don't need a 1st either.

Horvat and Tanev are 2 huge pieces, but honestly, with Matthews-Kadri-Bozak down the middle we would really not want to part ways with Marner, who adds a unique element. We think he can be PPG in the NHL.

Value-wise it's probably fair; but I think most fans would politely decline.

 

[Nickel eye Heel hers]

I thought Marner was in the dog house playing 4th line ?

If Babs continues to be displeased with the kid, Canucks might be over paying.

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

Toronto is going for a cup. Kapanen can't even get on the roster because of our young stars. Boeser would literally be waiting 3-4 years before he gets a look. We don't need a 1st either.

Horvat and Tanev are 2 huge pieces, but honestly, with Matthews-Kadri-Bozak down the middle we would really not want to part ways with Marner, who adds a unique element. We think he can be PPG in the NHL.

Value-wise it's probably fair; but I think most fans would politely decline.

Wait a minute, you think Horvat, Tanev, Boeser and a top 5 pick for Mitch Marner is fair value wise? I'm sorry but WHAT? I was being sarcastic, Horvat had 9 less points last year on a horrid team. The difference between him and Marner isn't one of those pieces much less all three lol

 

[FOurteenS inCisOr]

Toronto is going for a cup. Kapanen can't even get on the roster because of our young stars. Boeser would literally be waiting 3-4 years before he gets a look. We don't need a 1st either.

Horvat and Tanev are 2 huge pieces, but honestly, with Matthews-Kadri-Bozak down the middle we would really not want to part ways with Marner, who adds a unique element. We think he can be PPG in the NHL.

Value-wise it's probably fair; but I think most fans would politely decline.

No comment on the OP, but Boeser is considerably better than Kapanen, in case you're trying to imply otherwise.

 

[Puckstuff]

No comment on the OP, but Boeser is considerably better than Kapanen, in case you're trying to imply otherwise.

I'm not even going to bite.

 

[GoodbyeLuongo]

I'm not even going to bite.

I mean, based off their NHL totals albeit both being very limited, Boeser has produced and Kapanen hasn't so far. Soooooo...

 

[zeke]

Oh really? Boeser, Horvat, Tanev and a first doesn't get you Marner lol?

nope.

you don't trade away stars for lesser pieces.