Structure of Team Canada

Status
Not open for further replies.

chicpea*

Guest
One thing that should be added and I would like your comments on: I thought Team Canada's overall structure was excellent this year and with the exception of an Ian White type for the power play, I wouldn't change a thing for next year. I think 03/04 was a huge improvement over 02/03 and previous years. We were not only solid, but better and better each game. We all now what happened today, so please don't let a bad goal cloud your opinions.
 

CharlieGirl

Thank you Mr. Snider
Jun 24, 2003
30,538
3
Kitchener, ON
Visit site
I agree completely - the team that was selected was the best group of players. Had they continued to play their game through the third period, we'd be celebrating the gold medal. Unfortunately, they stopped banging and crashing early in the 3rd and let the USA play their game.

I wouldn't change anything either - next year's team should look very much like this one, with the addition of a goaltender, a physical presence to replace Paille, and a powerplay specialist on defense. Canada was able to roll four lines who could score, forecheck, and shut down the opposing team.
 

John Agar

The 4th Hanson Bro'
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
25,346
41,854
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Fehr, Brodziak instead of...

Jeremy Colliton might have made a difference.

I like Colliton as a player in the WHL. He has a future in pro as a role player - but...Canada needed more finishers in the crunch (ie. USA game). Jeremy was never a threat in this game and there is no one that can say Brodziak or Fehr would not/could not have adapted to the role player role.

That's my story...and I'm stickin' to it. :D
 

Ticallion961

Registered User
Mar 27, 2003
480
0
Nova Scotia
John Agar said:
Jeremy Colliton might have made a difference.

I like Colliton as a player in the WHL. He has a future in pro as a role player - but...Canada needed more finishers in the crunch (ie. USA game). Jeremy was never a threat in this game and there is no one that can say Brodziak or Fehr would not/could not have adapted to the role player role.

That's my story...and I'm stickin' to it. :D

not sure i agree, Canada put up an awful lot of goals, don't think they needed more finishers. I would have got rid of Dixon for Fehr though...Dixon had a tough tournament in a limited role
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad