EndBoards said:
And likewise, if Bettman hadn't chose an extreme stance FOR a cap, it would've been a done deal long ago..
is his stance so extreme?
the NHLPA ACCEPTED IT.
it just makes Goodenow foolish. And this all ties to Panger making comments about players and agents telling him that they were Sold up the river by Goodenow.
in the end, the entire stance by The NHL is meaningless, because the NHLPA accepted _EVERYTHING_ they offered. The NHL said they were paying to much, and gave numbers. The PA conceeded and came with a salary rollback. The NHL said they needed a cap, the PA came off and agreed to a cap.
What Negotiations did Goodenow do in this process? He just Ok'd everything the NHL Offered, he just figured his View would be accepted because of his great tactic of waiting till the last day.