Hivemind
We're Touched
I mean... I legitimately loved The Last Jedi, but comparing issues with that soft science fantasy with issues with Interstellar seems like a pretty big leap to me. I understand the idea of different standards for different attempts at authenticity, but that seems to be nitpicking to a great degree, especially as Interstellar probably handled time dilation better than really any major film that I can think of in recent memory. Or heck, even mentioned it versus not being a thing in most sci-fi flicks.
And I'm saying that as someone that personally thinks that Interstellar is Nolan's best film, to be fair.
It's not really nitpicking, at least in my view. Interstellar made orbital mechanics and time dilation a plot point, and spent a scene on exposition to explain it. Yet their explanation didn't hold water when examined closer. In order for the spacecraft to maintain a constant orbital position that they could return to, it would have to be at a lagrange point. Gravity has even more effect at lagrange points, meaning the time dialation would be even more extreme at a lagrange point than elsewhere. So the scientist remaining on the ship would have experienced less time than those on the planet.
In most movies, that would absolutely be nit picking. But the fact that interstellar took time to create a scene of exposition to explain it AND it was integral to plot points makes me much more frustrated by this oversight. By contrast, a movie like Star Wars is a fantastic universe with space wizards and plasma cannons. You already have to accept a great deal of creative liberty when it comes to science to appreciate the fantasy world in which Star Wars exists. I'm able to suspend disbelief a lot more when talking about the mumbo-jumbo science of Star Wars, because Star Wars is already setting aside actual science.