Slavin for Norris

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,124
38,089
He’s not going to score enough to get that kind of recognition unless the Canes inexplicably win 50 games and he’s a +50 or some ridiculous number. I can’t remember the last defenseman that won the Norris and didn’t play significant PP minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,124
38,089
I’d be happy if he got a substantial number of votes this year, but he’s going to need more games like last night to make that happen. Meaning not just playing well in losses, but generating points in wins.

If he gets a substantial number of votes it’ll be because he was the best defenseman in the league this year. And that’s a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
51,167
48,415
Winston-Salem NC
He’s not going to score enough to get that kind of recognition unless the Canes inexplicably win 50 games and he’s a +50 or some ridiculous number. I can’t remember the last defenseman that won the Norris and didn’t play significant PP minutes.
Exactly this. I mean who was the last defensive dman that won it, Langway? That's not a bash on guys like Karlsson at all, just goes to show how difficult it is to win the award as a defensive dman in any era.

I'd be thrilled with top 10 in Norris voting this year and a 35+ point season, which I don't think is too unrealistic.
 

Tryamw

Loyal Fan of Jerks
Sponsor
Nov 2, 2016
39,130
76,559
Durham
Yeah I'd be happy if he gets a fair number of votes. and I'm ultra glad he's on the Carolina Hurricanes. However that also eliminates some votes for him as well. (Not intentional more the lack of Exposure.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
If he plays a few more relatively high-profile games against Canadian teams and big-market teams like he did last night, people will have no choice but to recognize. I would think with the way he's playing D, 50 points would be enough to make him a serious contender but that's obviously asking a lot when we don't have forwards breaking the 50 point mark last few years.
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,701
8,884
He's not particularly dangerous with the puck at the point in terms of shot, passing, or movement. Even if he's a tier ahead of Burns or Karlsson defensively, it's not going to make up the difference between 35 points and 75 points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

Navin R Slavin

Fifth line center
Jan 1, 2011
16,203
63,547
Durrm NC
He's not particularly dangerous with the puck at the point in terms of shot, passing, or movement. Even if he's a tier ahead of Burns or Karlsson defensively, it's not going to make up the difference between 35 points and 75 points.

Hasn't he basically won the last couple of shootouts we've been involved in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

NotOpie

"Puck don't lie"
Jun 12, 2006
9,257
17,774
North Carolina
to be fair to Karlsson- he is great on defensive side of the game too

To be fair....this is a pretty significant overstatement. Karlsson is "adequate" on the defensive side of the puck. His skating makes up for a lot of other ills, but for all his shiftiness, his defensive stickwork isn't particularly outstanding and he's anything but physical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913
Jun 21, 2016
7,216
29,654
Latvia
To be fair....this is a pretty significant overstatement. Karlsson is "adequate" on the defensive side of the puck. His skating makes up for a lot of other ills, but for all his shiftiness, his defensive stickwork isn't particularly outstanding and he's anything but physical.
I can agree that he is not physical, but IMO his stick work is pretty good, and together with his speed and positioning - it all makes him good on defensive side of the game. Maybe I choose wrong word previously, he is not great, but really good as a defensive defender when needed. His offense is all people talk about, but his defensive plays are very good and he is playing in a lot of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,180
138,423
Bojangles Parking Lot
If he gets a substantial number of votes it’ll be because he was the best defenseman in the league this year. And that’s a good thing.

Not necessarily that he was the best... I can’t remember if they do Norris votes 1-3 or 1-5, but even a bunch of 5ths would be a sign of a fantastic season for him. To do that as a defensive-minded guy is outstanding.

Exactly this. I mean who was the last defensive dman that won it, Langway?

Chara, then Langway. Chara was a huge departure from the norm and it took him still being pretty good offensively.

He's got sweet moves. Why isn't he used on the PP more? Is it because his shot sucks or we'd rather his minutes be used for PK and even strength?

Slavin’s at his best offensively when he’s skating with the puck, we saw that last night. He actually does have pretty good handles coming across the line and every now and then we see this playmaker side emerge where he zips through coverage to the slot.

The problem is, that kind of skill set isn’t very useful on the PP. Defenses tend to play the point men very conservatively, unless there’s a Faulk-like slapshot threat up there. So it doesn’t do much good for your point guy to be up at the blue line looking for chances to carry the puck to the slot... it’s just not going to happen and is a good way to get a SH break going the other way. So barring a switch to forward, where he still wouldn’t be any better with the puck than the guy he replaces, there’s just not a useful function for Slavin during the PP.
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,124
38,089
Not necessarily that he was the best... I can’t remember if they do Norris votes 1-3 or 1-5, but even a bunch of 5ths would be a sign of a fantastic season for him. To do that as a defensive-minded guy is outstanding.



Chara, then Langway. Chara was a huge departure from the norm and it took him still being pretty good offensively.



Slavin’s at his best offensively when he’s skating with the puck, we saw that last night. He actually does have pretty good handles coming across the line and every now and then we see this playmaker side emerge where he zips through coverage to the slot.

The problem is, that kind of skill set isn’t very useful on the PP. Defenses tend to play the point men very conservatively, unless there’s a Faulk-like slapshot threat up there. So it doesn’t do much good for your point guy to be up at the blue line looking for chances to carry the puck to the slot... it’s just not going to happen and is a good way to get a SH break going the other way. So barring a switch to forward, where he still wouldn’t be any better with the puck than the guy he replaces, there’s just not a useful function for Slavin during the PP.

Even Chara had 19 goals and 50 points in his Norris year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roboturner913

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad