Hunter Gathers
The Crown
get over it, so him and his wife got into a scrap, should he be living under a bridge homeless forever ? he should have the RIGHT to work for an NHL team
I see you don't understand how "rights" work.
get over it, so him and his wife got into a scrap, should he be living under a bridge homeless forever ? he should have the RIGHT to work for an NHL team
Please - tell the lawyer more about he's wrong about the purpose of punishment as holding people accountable for past mistakes. I'm listening.
Seriously - it's not that hard not to bloody your wife. I don't beat my wife every day. I'm getting quite good at not beating her.Yeah. There are a number of us that haven't choked their wives or beat their partners.
I do consider that good for us.
What's "typical" is your generalizing of a specific incident. You're applying your "one size fits all" to a conflict you know nothing about.
Talk about ignorance and close mindedness.
holy ****... are you actually trying to say that there are situations where beating his wife bloody would be an appropriate response? You do know that's illegal right? And that he was charged with felony assault? Its not like "who hasn't gotten a parking ticket amirite"?
Also lmfao at "who hasn't lost their temper". People do that all the time. Lose their temper and decide that the way to channel that is beating your wife? Not so much.
Then you havent been in a real relationship, lol. Not saying you should act on it by any means, but if you dont want to choke your significant other on the daily, you're doing it wrong.
Oh my god you're one of those.Lmao. Because you're a lawyer (by the way, you have no idea what my background is so I wouldn't be so quick to try to establish yourself as an authority who knows more about this issue than me), that makes your word law on what constitutes the "foundation" of the criminal justice system.
Besides using a fallacy (argumentum ad vercundiam, the "argument from authority", or in this case, an appeal to an authority that is not actually an authority on the issue), you've also moved the goal posts. In the first post, you said, and I quote, "Peoples lives ABSOLUTELY should be and are ruined over past mistakes. That's the whole foundation behind our criminal justice system," and are now saying "the purpose of punishment as holding people accountable for past mistakes." Those are very different statements.
Seriously - it's not that hard not to bloody your wife. I don't beat my wife every day. I'm getting quite good at not beating her.
Right. I am applying the general concept of "don't ****ing choke your wife" to this thread.
Very ignorant, Mr. She Asked For It.
Oh my god you're one of those.
Another cliche from the Righteous One. Such a shocker!
Can't say I haven't choked my wife. But we're getting sidetracked here.I have such a good relationship with the woman I live with that I've managed for the past few years never to choke her, kick her, or throw her into a TV. I must just be a "keyboard moralist", though.
Oh my god you're one of those.
Nah, I think you're doing it wrong if you have the impusle to violently assault your parnter.
I actually yelled at my girlfriend yesterday when she suggested she may go vegan.Can't say I haven't choked my wife. But we're getting sidetracked here.
I'm not condoning beating women. I understand that it happens. I understand that sometimes situations get out of hand and that both sides bear responsibility.It's now a cliche to not beat your wife?
Also, if merely not beating my partner makes me "righteous", I really question what heinous stuff you condone (besides attacking women).
This thread is just showing that HF is really filled with some disgusting pieces of garbage. I know we all joke about how toxic it is here because of pointless hockey threads, arguements over who's better than who, but this thread really does show that yea, this place has some really terrible people in it.
How do you suppose the non American's in the NFL have their jobs?I honestly don't know what they do in the NFL, but from what I gather that's probably not the example you would want to follow. Moreover - as has been mentioned - there are no corresponding visa issues for these NFL cases.
Oh my god you're one of those.
It's offensive to me as well but its not even a crime that relates to hockey.I dunno about your moral compass, but choking women and beating them is pretty offensive to me. Regardless if I personally see it taking place.
You do you, though.
I'm not condoning beating women. I understand that it happens. I understand that sometimes situations get out of hand and that both sides bear responsibility.
I know that falls out side the feminine "women are always right" point of view of a ****.
It's offensive to me as well but its not even a crime that relates to hockey.
You are a cliche.
You ever been in a fight? Just curious.