Value of: Silfverberg + Nick Ritchie

[Deam78]

In an earlier post involving these two, the demand for Ritchie was a speedy winger and the demand for Silf was pick+prospect.

I offered:
W. Bitten
P. Byron
2nd pick (35th OA)

The opinion was pretty evenly split in both fan bases.

 

[bsu]

In an earlier post involving these two, the demand for Ritchie was a speedy winger and the demand for Silf was pick+prospect.

I offered:
W. Bitten
P. Byron
2nd pick (35th OA)

The opinion was pretty evenly split in both fan bases.

Rather get 1 really good player than a bunch of small pieces

 

[405Exit]

Rather get 1 really good player than a bunch of small pieces

Agree. We should be able to get a bonafide 2/3 LW with that package. The current deals are pretty horrible to be honest.

 

[harrisb]

Sens offer Bobby Ryan for the package but you also need to somehow include Noesen in the deal

 

[MMC]

Sens offer Bobby Ryan for the package but you also need to somehow include Noesen in the deal

Love Bobby Ryan but nah.

 

[bsu]

Hoffman/Galchenyuk/ etc.

 

[Deam78]

Rather get 1 really good player than a bunch of small pieces

Totally understandable. My offer was only based on the other poster demands at the time.

 

[405Exit]

Hoffman/Galchenyuk/ etc.

That deal should get it done for Galchenyuk. Murray!!! Call the Habs see what they want for a LW upgrade! The whole fricken Habs roster is loaded at LW including Patches.

Awesome proposal Business

 

[dracom]

That deal should get it done for Galchenyuk. Murray!!! Call the Habs see what they want for a LW upgrade! The whole fricken Habs roster is loaded at LW including Patches.

Awesome proposal Business

Jeez, you both have no idea what you're talking about. Habs have no use for a Silf+Ritchie deal for Galchenyuk. The Sens have no use for Silf or Ritchie for Hoffman. That's not even factoring in that those two together don't have enough value for either of those players. Neither of you are actually considering the other teams needs and grossly overrating our players you're trying to ship off.

And stop with your obsession with wanting to add guys like Patches or JVR to this team already. Patches is one more year from FA and in no world do we have enough cap space for him. Same can be said about JVR. We can not afford to give 6x6+ contracts to guys in their late 20's when we already have so much allocated to Perry, Getz, and Kes.

 

[simon IC]

I would be fine with Thompson OR Winnipeg's 1st from the Blues.

 

[FameFlame069]

So I seen a top 9 LW for the two? Bennett has played 50 games at LW (this year) and if I recall correctly his first season was mainly at LW on Backlund-Frolik line so lets say 50(1st season/his best season IMO), so let's go with 100+ games played at LW (also his best point paces came at LW) so what would Calgary need to add to Bennett to get Silf? Bennett is 6 years younger and is still developing while Silf is older and looks like he is what he is, throughout the last few seasons Silf has out produced Bennett. Both bring their intangibles, and before someone says we're divisional rivals just know around the league it only exists if it's a huge rivalry (Cgy&Edm, Ny&Ny, Bos&Mtl, Chi&Det, etc..)

 

[405Exit]

Jeez, you both have no idea what you're talking about. Habs have no use for a Silf+Ritchie deal for Galchenyuk. The Sens have no use for Silf or Ritchie for Hoffman. That's not even factoring in that those two together don't have enough value for either of those players. Neither of you are actually considering the other teams needs and grossly overrating our players you're trying to ship off.

And stop with your obsession with wanting to add guys like Patches or JVR to this team already. Patches is one more year from FA and in no world do we have enough cap space for him. Same can be said about JVR. We can not afford to give 6x6+ contracts to guys in their late 20's when we already have so much allocated to Perry, Getz, and Kes.

We’re trying to upgrade the forward group specially left wing. If you have no other suggestions besides knocking down proposals why even bother posting in this thread? Makes absolutely no sense.

 

[Filthy Dangles]

Ritchie's value will be inflated based on where he was taken in his draft year. Do not want. Anaheim would want s hall for a good 2nd liner in Silf and a career bottom 6 player in Ritchie.

Teams would probably only be interested in one or the other, and more likely Silferberg

 

[LASTAR]

Mattias Janmark and Gemel Smith from Dallas

Janmark and Rakell seem to have some great chemistry in worlds, and they both bring speed, something that Anaheim sorely need.

 

[WingsOverAvs]

Mattias Janmark and Gemel Smith from Dallas

Janmark and Rakell seem to have some great chemistry in worlds, and they both bring speed, something that Anaheim sorely need.

DAL needs to desperately add, not subtract

 

[DarthProbert]

Oilers 1st and a later pick for both. Oilers need wing depth and can't be waiting around for another prospect to possibly develop eventually.

 

[simon IC]

Would any Ducks fans be willing to take a chance on Robby Fabbri? Silferberg is perfect for the Blues, but I have little interest in Ritchie. We have lots of players like Ritchie on the roster and in the system. I was thinking something along the lines of Fabbri for Silf and a possible exchange of 2019 conditional picks. Fabbri is a risk, coming off ALC surgery, but if he returns to form he is a legit top 6 winger, still on an ELC. Perhaps Silferberg for Fabbri and Anaheims 2019 2nd, depending on games played/points from Fabbri. If he plays less than so many games, Blues pay a 2019 2nd. Does this make any sense?

 

[anezthes]

Perhaps Silferberg for Fabbri and Anaheims 2019 2nd

Silfver + 2nd for Fabbri? No, thank you.

 

[elitepete]

Baertschi for Ritchie?

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Would any Ducks fans be willing to take a chance on Robby Fabbri? Silferberg is perfect for the Blues, but I have little interest in Ritchie. We have lots of players like Ritchie on the roster and in the system. I was thinking something along the lines of Fabbri for Silf and a possible exchange of 2019 conditional picks. Fabbri is a risk, coming off ALC surgery, but if he returns to form he is a legit top 6 winger, still on an ELC. Perhaps Silferberg for Fabbri and Anaheims 2019 2nd, depending on games played/points from Fabbri. If he plays less than so many games, Blues pay a 2019 2nd. Does this make any sense?

Um honestly probably too complicated... and fabbri is too much of a question mark to just move silf for... that's a pretty huge risk from Anaheim perspective.

 

[TheBradyBunch]

Hoffman + Dzingel + 4th
for
Silfverberg + Ritchie + 1st + 3rd

Ducks get much faster and add two 20 goal scorers (both of whom had more pts than Silf last year)

Sens save money, get younger (Ritchie), add some picks and have the option of keeping Silf on as a vet or flipping him for another high pick (I'd flip)

 

[anezthes]

Hoffman + Dzingel + 4th
for
Silfverberg + Ritchie + 1st + 3rd

Nope.