BigMac1212
I feel...alone.
After Villanova's 3-point barrage in the National Semifinal, Dick Vitale went on a verbal tirade over the NCAA's position over the distance of the 3-point line. He was not alone. (Although, I always thought Duke was the 3-point shot abuser). I felt that in this year's NIT had some rule changes, like four quarter, a further 3-point line, and NBA-distance paint, but the proposed rules couldn't pass after next season.
So, I ask; should the NCAA push back the 3-point line?
The 3-point line is a touchy subject. On the one hand, we will have the Villanova's & Duke's that will use and abuse the shot. On the other hand, I heard when the line was pushed back the first time that the further line will penalize smaller schools with smaller lineups. Also, keep in mind that Villanova shot LESS 3-pointers and converted FEWER SHOTS from downtown in their Regional Finals win against Texas Tech. I'm a bit undecided. I'm sure you guys will have a better understanding of the subject. So I leave the forum to you.
So, I ask; should the NCAA push back the 3-point line?
The 3-point line is a touchy subject. On the one hand, we will have the Villanova's & Duke's that will use and abuse the shot. On the other hand, I heard when the line was pushed back the first time that the further line will penalize smaller schools with smaller lineups. Also, keep in mind that Villanova shot LESS 3-pointers and converted FEWER SHOTS from downtown in their Regional Finals win against Texas Tech. I'm a bit undecided. I'm sure you guys will have a better understanding of the subject. So I leave the forum to you.
