Redwingsfan
Global Moderator
- Jul 15, 2006
- 20,370
- 187
i think if you combine webers offensive ability with his brute physical force you have a player who (although i like seabrooke) has a higher ceiling than seabrooke. as far as jj goes. weber has proven he can handle the nhl. jj hasnt. and ej has a ways to go before he is nhl ready. weber is ready for a top4 role in the nhl (so is seabrooke) i think weber and seabrooke have a very close upside as far as offense (seabrooke will get more pp time for now, as on a weaker team) but webers physical game edges out seabrooke in my opinion.
i can go along with your opinion on weber vs seabrook. because they are pretty close. but i would have taken seabrook. but keep in mind that jj is two and ej is three years younger then weber. and they could both easely have taken a top four role this season if they wanted to. age 18 to 21. you develop a hell of a lot in that period of time.