coolhand
Registered User
He can stickhandle and carry the puck over the blue line while on his back!
Gretzky or Lemeuix could NEVER do that!
Gretzky or Lemeuix could NEVER do that!
so if the calculations is correct, that is like what many have said in different way. Seabs is skating like he has a elephant on his back.The fact is Seabrook's play has been brutally incompetent this season thru 5 games...
FYI...9 give-aways in just 5 games...project yhat forv82vgamesvyou get 27. 6 give-aways
..his career per 82 game average bis just 64 give-aways..
..
For his career ,Seabrook has 27 take-aways per 82 games. .so far in 5 games ,Zero take-aways. HE HAS Zero poitsvhis last 4 games after a good start offensively in game 1.
But the eyeball test. .his slower than required speed at his age Now already is too slow to play effectively in the NHL...guys fly past him on rushes and he is too slow to get to them when tracking from behind or to get over to cover a gap ..AND you can see co-ordination /agility issues as he keeps stumbling and tripping over his own skates and is too often lying on the ice as goals are scored against us..He should no longer be pn the first pairing or 2nd pairing ...and if this brutal play jeeps but. ..Maybe should not be played at all...I cannot stand total incompetence but that is the level he has sunk to.
yeah you may be right, moving down to the 3rd pairing may be a great idea.The way Rutta, Forsling and Kempny are playing right now gives me a bit relief because if they continue playing well, Seabrook is going to get less and lesd minutes. If Rutta can play with Keith, Forsling pans out with Murphy, Kempny and Seabrook are perfect playing as 3rd pair.
ok i am see the sarcasm but what else can the org do ??/\ or perhaps I can play center for the Kane line. :rolleyes;
yeah you may be right, moving down to the 3rd pairing may be a great idea.
Yep but there are so many ifs so better hope for the best. Being optimistic is healthy, being like a certain Blackhawk here is sick.
but his contract, esp the yr'ly salary is doable.But to be fair...Keith is declining too..Or at least gotten sloppily. ..Tge fumbles that started ladt season continue egregiously thru 5 games this season.
Guess what?Keith ALSO has 9 give-aeays thru 5GP!! Project that for 83 games and you get 147.6 GVS ...Add the Seabrook projected 147.6 GVS and you get stratospheric incompetence in the #1 d-pair combo for a season..You simply cannot have 18 give-aways in 5GP by approx $1million of combo cost playing in Any pair let alone your #2 pairing ...outrageously sloppy and incompetent.At least Keith has 5 take'aways thru 5 games to partially male up for his high give-aways.
while i like your thought process, i still don't see the org moving him.Our only hope is to be able to move Seabrook to a team that is willing to take on his salary for an asset and then move him with retained salary (50% retained Seabrook could be moved to a team for assets).
Not many teams out there where you can do this but the AVs are 4-5 years out minimum so they could be an option. If they still want to move Barrie you could try Seabrook/1st/mid-level prospect for Barrie. This would still be meh as an offer and I don't know if they are still sour on Barrie.
Outside of last night, Seabrook has been playing well this year.
Outside of last night, Seabrook has been playing well this year.
The way Rutta, Forsling and Kempny are playing right now gives me a bit relief because if they continue playing well, Seabrook is going to get less and lesd minutes. If Rutta can play with Keith, Forsling pans out with Murphy, Kempny and Seabrook are perfect playing as 3rd pair.
7M cap NMC guy in 3rd pairing for seven seasons, looks like someone did very bad decision a year or so ago..
On the other side, if you know how these older guys ie Hossa, Jagr played at that age, maybe Seabrook should just do more in the summer to be prepared for the season.