Like I said, I'm not going to go and dig old articles for you, which would probably be needed in order to talk in deep about their approximation as far as information is concerned, so no, I guess I don't have any specifics for you.
It is nothing like The Hockey News blunder a few weeks ago either. My opinion is based on years of listening to RDS and seeing how they tend to take comments out of context and distort them, use quotes to support the journalist's assumptions but writing it as fact, using misleading sentences or words that give an other meaning, or blur the original meaning of the article, and even though those things are generally benign, they add-up over the years (and it has lead me to seek for sports news elsewhere for that very reason).
BTW, there's indeed nothing wrong with columnists that have biased opinions and don't shy away from expressing them. However, there is something wrong with hiding your bias behind facts and twisting the information to create a news that isn't there, which happened time and time again in the Koivu/Ribeiro saga. For all their cumulated inaccuracies, I came to the conclusion I couldn't rely on them to get cold hard facts without a tint added to it for whatever reason.