It is always endlessly fascinating to me that Subban seems to be more underrated by his own fans, while having the outside reputation of being completely overrated.
Just my 2 cents, but he completely deserved his nomination- and it is not just about points. You have to dig deeper and go below the surface stuff to see just how good he is, and has been.
Came across this from Greg Wyshynski- ESPN-
”P.K. Subban's nomination for the Norris Trophy is an important one, at least for me as a Professional Hockey Writers Association voter, because it appears that my peers have done some heavy lifting to get there rather than relying on the lazy metrics.
He was eighth in points. He was 21st in time on ice, playing less than Roman Josi for the Nashville Predators. And Josi, frankly, was the glamor pick for best defenseman on the team for most of the season. To arrive at Subban as a Norris Trophy possibility is to dig deeper in the context of his season. Like seeing his 33 even-strength points within the context of having only 42.5 percent of his shifts starting in the offensive zone. Like understanding his impact as a shutdown defender. Like watching the sparks come off the ice as he drags around Alexei Emelin like the anchor that he was.
So this is refreshing.”
I think this sums it up fairly well. You can argue he has the hardest job and most responsibility of any of our top 4- is consistently put in the toughest positions.
So again, not to get off on a tangent here, I think the nomination is well deserved- he has had a great season. And I mentioned this previously, but he and Ekholm have have been very good the past 3 games after a rough, rough game 1.