Hawker14
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2004
- 3,084
- 0
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/WinnipegSun/Sports/2005/03/19/966054-sun.html
is interference and intimidation of a locked-out employee covered under sections 7 & 8 of the NLRB Act ?
it's my opinion that it is. players signing contracts and playing during the lockout is a concerted activity of the union and authorized by the NHLPA. it's pretty clear to me that poile is violating section 8(a)i of the act.
I imagine this story is going to gain alot of teeth if the league goes the impasse route, followed by the nhlpa filing with the nlrb.
Predators GM David Poile told The Tennessean, "It's very disappointing to both myself and the Nashville Predators that Mark Eaton never called anyone in the organization to let us know where he was going or why.
"Will this affect our relationship with Mark Eaton going forward? You're (darn) right it will."
is interference and intimidation of a locked-out employee covered under sections 7 & 8 of the NLRB Act ?
it's my opinion that it is. players signing contracts and playing during the lockout is a concerted activity of the union and authorized by the NHLPA. it's pretty clear to me that poile is violating section 8(a)i of the act.
I imagine this story is going to gain alot of teeth if the league goes the impasse route, followed by the nhlpa filing with the nlrb.