Buffaloed said:
There's good and bad with a free market. The irony here is that the NHLPA argues for free market selectively. The NHLPA only wants a free market to pertain to aspects that will benefit it.
Well yes. But the NHLPA is negotiating restrictions ot will accept from a free market for the good of the game. They are bound to a team, unable to negotiate their value where they best can be used. Can be cut on a whim. Despite guaranteed contracts, most have no security and little leverage or negotiating rights.
If there was a free market, would Spezza have signed with Ottawa? I think he would of preferred to go to a young team where he could get #1 line ice time. Who knows, maybe a prefectly free market is really the best fairness. The players wanting to maximize their ice team, will tend to sign in a way that make the league competitively balanced.
Its not that im in favour a of a free market. I want to balance the players rights to negotiate their value in a job where they have no guarantees and can be let go at any time, with the needs of owners to have a salary system that provides an opportunity to develop a team up until its UFA and make money, with fans seem to enjoy in sports teams which is keeping your players, with the natural reality that teams in hiockey develop slowly over a half dozen years, have a prime period, then age and can only stay together if they are champs.. To keep your players, you have to make a trade off. You cant keep them at all times, in any situation, for any money, keep any player forever. But you can keep them past their prime until they are 31. A fair trade off.
Im in favour of this particular marketplace as the best compromise to meet all needs of allowing:
owners the opportunity to profit,
players to negotiate their value in a marketplace,.
fans to have teams that grow with them until their ufas
the natural team building cycle that fans love
It works with the natural order of things. A team like Tampa will now have Richards and Lecavalier for several years at quite reasonable prices. I see no reason why Tampa Bay is in any Danger of losing key players like Detroit losing Federov.
If they want a free market, they can decertify and take the good with the bad. There's more bad than good in a free market for the vast majority of the NHLPA. In a true free market the NHL is competing with the SEL, RSL and other Euro leagues to sign players, rather than against itself.
They are competing against them now. A free market would be a boon to agents. Decertifying is not a pretty process. Similar to bringing in strikebreakers, it is a tactic for a fight not a solution. But who knows, we've never tried it, a free market could actually work real well. It works pretty well everywhere else - why not sports?