How much you wanna bet mantha still remains in the net front position on the pp, just on the other unit that Rasmussen isn't on
For example, Blash talks about Mantha's role as a net front player and how though it may not be the first option Mantha would desire such as his natural spot at the circles, and how it is important to embrace it. When you and I have jobs in the real world it is important to branch out and learn different skills to help toward your end goal. I feel like Blash putting Mantha in a net front position is his way of doing this. It is a great opportunity for Mantha to learn how to dictate and impact the game in a different way for the future. Its harder to stop a player with a diverse skill set.
How much you wanna bet mantha still remains in the net front position on the pp, just on the other unit that Rasmussen isn't on
Blash doesn't run the power play.Blash isn’t gonna be here next year, so we all have 0 idea
Blash doesn't run the power play, Torchetti does.Blash isn’t gonna be here next year, so we all have 0 idea
I wouldn't be surprised if he's still around. Holland always says that he doesn't blame Blash for the team's development.Blash isn’t gonna be here next year, so we all have 0 idea
Blash doesn't run the power play.
Blash doesn't run the power play, Torchetti does.
Would like to hear everyone's thoughts on Mantha.
He just never seems very dangerous to me. For all the talent that he has, I'm starting to have trouble seeing the 30/30 winger we envisioned him to be.
I see a perimeter winger who for the most part is a passenger on his line. I still see a ton of value in that role, especially in terms of possession. But a dominant scoring force? He can barely score in a season where everyone and their grandma is producing.
Maybe Larkin set the standard too high, but Mantha just doesn't excite me.
Well, if he wants to excite me more, he can start with shooting the puck.
Would like to hear everyone's thoughts on Mantha.
He just never seems very dangerous to me. For all the talent that he has, I'm starting to have trouble seeing the 30/30 winger we envisioned him to be.
I see a perimeter winger who for the most part is a passenger on his line. I still see a ton of value in that role, especially in terms of possession. But a dominant scoring force? He can barely score in a season where everyone and their grandma is producing.
Maybe Larkin set the standard too high, but Mantha just doesn't excite me.
Would like to hear everyone's thoughts on Mantha.
He just never seems very dangerous to me. For all the talent that he has, I'm starting to have trouble seeing the 30/30 winger we envisioned him to be.
I see a perimeter winger who for the most part is a passenger on his line. I still see a ton of value in that role, especially in terms of possession. But a dominant scoring force? He can barely score in a season where everyone and their grandma is producing.
Maybe Larkin set the standard too high, but Mantha just doesn't excite me.
When Mantha was drafted, some suggested that his potential may be Johan Franzen. I'm now starting to believe this, because some games Mantha looks like a star, and many other games he just disappears. This was pretty much how Franzen was.
On a better team, I think Mantha is capable of being a 20-30 goal / 50-60 point player on regular basis, and he may have a year or two where he'll exceed these expectations, but overall I agree with Bob McKenzie when he said that his compete level is not that high.
When Mantha was drafted, some suggested that his potential may be Johan Franzen. I'm now starting to believe this, because some games Mantha looks like a star, and many other games he just disappears. This was pretty much how Franzen was.
On a better team, I think Mantha is capable of being a 20-30 goal / 50-60 point player on regular basis, and he may have a year or two where he'll exceed these expectations, but overall I agree with Bob McKenzie when he said that his compete level is not that high.
I think this is an incredibly wrong comparison. I was no fan of post breakout Franzen mostly because of his deal and injury history, but, Mantha hasn't shown anything that Franzen did when he wasn't scoring. I think people are very quick to forget that Franzen wasn't some slouch who when he wasn't scoring was completely useless. He broke into this league on the back of his ability to be pretty good defensively and his ability to muck it out. Mantha, unless he's on, is very much a floater/perimeter player.
You're mistaken Franzen of the early years with the Franzen of the latter years. When he broke into the league, he was not meant to be anything more than a bottom-6 depth guy, and he surely was just that, working very hard and playing excellent defensive hockey. Then somewhere along the lines he evolved into this offensive player that goes on incredible superstar streaks. In this part of his career, when he was on, he was usually the best player on the ice, but for most part, he floated.
Philly wouldn’t even give an answer before they hung up the phone.Would anyone here move Mantha for Travis Konecny from Philly? I’m not sure if Philly would do that deal but I feel like maybe there could be some interest there.
Thoughts?
That’s what I was wondering, I don’t really know their team needs too much. Thanks for the input! Would us adding something get it close to be realistic? I really like Konecny’s gamePhilly wouldn’t even give an answer before they hung up the phone.
The only way he's going to become a 30 goal guy in the NHL is if he commits to being a net front presence. He probably doesn't have the stones for that role so he'll probably end up being a 20-25 goal guy. I don't say that as a criticism as very few players can embrace that role. Homer and Mule did and they both had very successful NHL careers. Mantha simply doesn't have the drive to play that sort of game. Again, it's not said as a criticism, just an acknowledgement of reality.Would like to hear everyone's thoughts on Mantha.
He just never seems very dangerous to me. For all the talent that he has, I'm starting to have trouble seeing the 30/30 winger we envisioned him to be.
I see a perimeter winger who for the most part is a passenger on his line. I still see a ton of value in that role, especially in terms of possession. But a dominant scoring force? He can barely score in a season where everyone and their grandma is producing.
Maybe Larkin set the standard too high, but Mantha just doesn't excite me.
The only way he's going to become a 30 goal guy in the NHL is if he commits to being a net front presence. He probably doesn't have the stones for that role so he'll probably end up being a 20-25 goal guy. I don't say that as a criticism as very few players can embrace that role. Homer and Mule did and they both had very successful NHL careers. Mantha simply doesn't have the drive to play that sort of game. Again, it's not said as a criticism, just an acknowledgement of reality.
I've been pushing for trading him for a few years now. He's a nice guy but he is what he is and it's highly unlikely he ever grows beyond the player he is right now.
They wouldn’t do it.Would anyone here move Mantha for Travis Konecny from Philly? I’m not sure if Philly would do that deal but I feel like maybe there could be some interest there.
Thoughts?
I’m fully on board with trading Mantha, he has all the tools but lacks the elbow grease and drive to use them all. He’s 6’5 and softer than baby-poo. It’s so frustrating watching a guy be so big and so soft. If Mantha has the work ethic of Glen-dawg Mantha would be a force in the mold of Wheeler. I hope we trade him at the draft tbh