Petesfan8
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2017
- 422
- 248
I find your reasoning regarding the Paquette trade difficult to understand. You talk about having this player for 2.5 years as a positive, my way of thinking is if you get a player who doesn't produce the shorter time he is taking up a spot on your team the better. This guy was a disappointment in the playoffs last year and it has continued this season. In defence of our GM, apparently there was other players that he was pursuing who were ranked ahead of Paquette but they weren't interested in coming here. If that was the case no trade is better than a poor trade. Getting the right guy may have meant the Petes winning the East last year. Let's hope they cut ties at the end of this season and go with a younger player with some passion.