He's a nice complimentary winger. But unless the team acquiring him has a Sidney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin to send him out there with, that production mostly evaporates. He's never hit 40 with them, I'm convinced he would never do it without them. He's a middle six depth winger that can you can afford to play higher in the lineup if someone else is driving the offense. Props to Chayka for turning that offer down.
He was on pace for 40 points in 2016-2017 and was on pace for 45 points this season. He's not a "20-30 point winger without Crosby and Malkin", that's a ridiculous claim to make. I think you're just underrating Rust here. I don't know if he brings back Fabbri or a Fabbri equivalent player, but that's the kind of player the Penguins are probably looking at for Rust.
If I had to guess, they'd either want to do something like the rumored Domi offer (Rust+ for Domi) or they'd want to get basically a LW version of Rust that's either cheaper or younger. The latter is similar to the Hagelin deal from 2015, where the Rangers more or less traded him straight up for Emerson Etem (it was Etem and a mid 2nd for Hagelin, a late 2nd and a 4th IIRC). Hagelin is probably the best player comparison for Rust, although Rust is more skilled and versatile.
Very, very high on Rust. I would love him on the Blues! I like the Fabbri idea, but I think the Pens add a bit.I'd want Fabbri for Rust, which is more in line with the Penguins going after Domi with using Rust as a trade chip. I think the purpose of trading Rust would be:
1. Saving some money on RW, since they have Kessel and Hornqvist making $12.1 million combined and Sprong likely getting a nice raise in the near future if he hits
2. Balancing out the RW/LW depth, since the Penguins are horribly imbalanced right now on the wings
3. Getting some more skill to play with Crosby and Malkin, since they really only have 1 skilled LWer in Guentzel. I feel like Sheary is very likely being traded this week.
Lucic for rust?
I wouldn't move Rust, but if we were to do it, it wouldn't be for another RW.There would have to be an add from the Pens, but what about something around Tyler Toffoli for Bryan Rust+ ?
What sort of a contract is Rust looking at going forward do you think? I sure would hate to see STL trade off something aside from a Berglund or Sobotka for Rust and then in return see Rust have the same sort of contract with the same sort of production and become the whipping boy like Berglund and Sobotka.
We ideally need to shed one of Sobotka or Berglund or in the very least fill out the top 6 to allow them to play on the 3rd instead of having either one of them are into the 1st and 2nd line roles due to our deficiencies up front of filling out each line.
Lucic for rust?
Lucic for rust?
"We need to get deeper... balance throughout our lineup."
Trading Rust would sure accomplish that.
What sort of a contract is Rust looking at going forward do you think? I sure would hate to see STL trade off something aside from a Berglund or Sobotka for Rust and then in return see Rust have the same sort of contract with the same sort of production and become the whipping boy like Berglund and Sobotka.
We ideally need to shed one of Sobotka or Berglund or in the very least fill out the top 6 to allow them to play on the 3rd instead of having either one of them are into the 1st and 2nd line roles due to our deficiencies up front of filling out each line.
There would have to be an add from the Pens, but what about something around Tyler Toffoli for Bryan Rust+ ?
C'mon man.
I'd like to see Rust in an Oilers jersey but I certainly wouldn't give up a young player on an ELC like Puljujarvi or Yamamoto to do it. I'm not certain what would entice Rutherford to trade him. Could the Penguins use a player like Strome?
If you assume that he means "balance" as in LW/RW balance, it makes sense because the Penguins are absurdly deep on RW and Rust is a RW. If you think he means "balance" as in offense/defense in the bottom-6, it makes sense because the Penguins have a lot of defensive wingers in the bottom-6 and they need more skill there. It makes sense in either way you look at it.
I think he's looking at about a $3 million cap hit. That's not a problem for him, it's just a problem because the Penguins are paying Hornqvist and Kessel as much as they're paying him. Like I said on the first page, I'd personally want to do Rust+ for Fabbri, but I may be convinced to do Rust for Sobotka if that's the best offer out there.
If we're talking about LA, I would rather target Pearson than Toffoli if they're trading Rust. Pearson makes a lot more sense from the Penguins POV and I'm not sure the Kings would trade a skilled offensive winger in Toffoli over an all around winger in Pearson.
The only positions Strome plays are positions that the Penguins are already really deep in, so no, not really.
I would really rather see the Pens trade Sheary than Rust if they're looking to move a middle 6 winger. I think Rust's game is much more consistent.
what are you adding to Lucic and how much salary of his are you retaining to make that fair for the Pens?Lucic for rust?
Rust would not get Domi. Rutherford offered both sheary and Rust for Domi (separately I assume- but it may have taken the package of them). Either or... both of those pieces alone need a +.I'd want Fabbri for Rust, which is more in line with the Penguins going after Domi with using Rust as a trade chip. I think the purpose of trading Rust would be:
1. Saving some money on RW, since they have Kessel and Hornqvist making $12.1 million combined and Sprong likely getting a nice raise in the near future if he hits
2. Balancing out the RW/LW depth, since the Penguins are horribly imbalanced right now on the wings
3. Getting some more skill to play with Crosby and Malkin, since they really only have 1 skilled LWer in Guentzel. I feel like Sheary is very likely being traded this week.