Penalties in OT Should be a Penalty Shot

maacoshark

Registered User
Jul 22, 2017
9,629
3,723
People love 3 on 3 hockey, so why not have more of it? Whenever a penalty is called in OT, it seems to slow the game down a little bit by 1. adding the extra man and 2. free icing for the team that has only 3 players. It gets relatively boring watching a team pound shots for two minutes at a goaltender, so why not just make all penalties a penalty shot and end the infraction right there and get back to 3 on 3? By definition, this is extra time, and you're trying to end the game with a decision as quickly as possible while staying true to the sport. Thoughts?
You must be a relatively new hockey fan. Not everyone likes 3 on 3. And the penalty shot comment has to be a joke.
 

LeafShark

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
1,724
294
You must be a relatively new hockey fan. Not everyone likes 3 on 3. And the penalty shot comment has to be a joke.

I don't know, you seem to be a newer fan. I never said everyone loved it. I said people in general loved it.
 

isles55

Registered User
Mar 7, 2015
1,825
852
The entire purpose of going to 3-on-3 was to avoid the skills conpetition deciding a game.
 

Hockeyholic

Registered User
Apr 20, 2017
16,362
9,901
Condo My Dad Bought Me
Not sure about a penalty shot before OT ends. That said, I'd be open to a shootout after double OT. The players need energy to play the remaining games and/or potential next opponent.
 

brokenhole

Registered User
Aug 12, 2015
1,135
408
Put a free bar in the penalty box in o.t. If the game doesn't end quick it will be very entertaining.
 

Tkachuky

Registered User
Dec 30, 2009
5,280
2,883
In the Dome
No they gotta stop trying to fix things that aren't broken. It would just open a can of worms and you'd have threads every week complaining about it lol.

This. Nothing needs fixing. It's like they don't have any better things to 'fix' so they focus on OT/SO and how to fix every year.
 

Spirit of 67

Registered User
Nov 25, 2016
7,061
4,938
Aurora, On.
People love 3 on 3 hockey, so why not have more of it? Whenever a penalty is called in OT, it seems to slow the game down a little bit by 1. adding the extra man and 2. free icing for the team that has only 3 players. It gets relatively boring watching a team pound shots for two minutes at a goaltender, so why not just make all penalties a penalty shot and end the infraction right there and get back to 3 on 3? By definition, this is extra time, and you're trying to end the game with a decision as quickly as possible while staying true to the sport. Thoughts?
I like it.
My cousin goes on endlessly how they should call more Penalty Shots. They're more exciting.
So why not do it?

At the very least, try for a season in the A.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,204
138,571
Bojangles Parking Lot
I think about it this way:

Currently there is only one thing you can do which creates an automatic penalty shot due to the amount of time on the clock, and that is deliberately knocking the net off its pegs in the final 2 minutes. Other things you can do to create a penalty shot: trip someone on a breakaway, dive on top of a loose puck in the crease, throw your stick or glove at the puck, jump off the bench illegally to prevent a breakaway.

The governing principle here is that the penalty shot restores an imminent scoring opportunity that was taken away illegally.

OP proposes that penalty shots be awarded for non-scoring opportunity infractions, based entirely on the time of game. I can’t get on board with that, because it’s not aligned with the opportunity-restoring purpose of a penalty shot. A random offensive-zone tripping penalty is simply a 2 minute minor, not something that should result in the opponent getting a free shot on the other net to determine the outcome of the game.
 

Jepprey

Creeper
May 25, 2006
6,919
1,844
3on3 is already gimmicky as f***. And while it is entertaining to me. I don't like shootouts deciding games.

Frankly, rather remove the shootout totally and do 3on3 until somebody wins.
 

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
I already get frustrated watching refs stare down obviously penalties in OT because they're afraid of making a call that's going to determine the outcome of the game. Make every penalty a PS and we may never see another OT penalty called again. Can you imagine the outrage if a player lifts an opponents stick and gets a little into his hands in the offensive zone and they get a penalty shot for it? The puck goes on edge and your team's player shoots the puck over the glass and they lose the game on a penalty shot? I don't see a problem with 4 on 3 so to me if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

Chimpradamus

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
16,634
5,249
Northern Sweden
giphy.gif


How about no? Why? How much more anticlimatic could it be?
 

Roomtemperature

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
5,849
686
New Jersey
So..... changing to 5 on 5 from 3 on 3 should be fine then :nod:. And while we're at it, change to ending in ties after 5 minutes of that.

I'm just saying the game of hockey can change and if there's ice, an object, a stick and a goal its hockey. Now doesn't mean we should or its good but to argue we shouldn't change because to quote the movie Babe " The way things are is the way things are" means we would have never gotten there and be stuck 6 on 6 and no forward pass
 

justafan22

Registered User
Jun 22, 2014
11,629
6,249
3on3 is already gimmicky as ****. And while it is entertaining to me. I don't like shootouts deciding games.

Frankly, rather remove the shootout totally and do 3on3 until somebody wins.

It would never happen, but I'd just make 3 on 3 10 minutes and bring back ties. If there isn't a goal after 10 minutes on 3 on 3, then it's deserved as a tie, since it would be harder to not score
 

Burke the Legend

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
8,317
2,850
Do they give penalty shots in your beer league because everyone is too lazy to keep track of penalty box times? dumb
 

westc2

Registered User
Nov 2, 2015
1,151
471
St. Louis, MO
In the regular season, if there's a defensive zone penalty with less than 30 seconds to go, it should result in a penalty shot, and no delayed penalty.

Imagine a scenario where a defensemen is about to take a shot from the point with 1 second remaining and then gets tomahawk slashed from behind and has his stick broken....and the game just ends and they give the slasher a penalty at the end of the game when it's too late.

I think that's a major flaw in the penalty system. Players are free to get late game penalties since it won't result in a full powerplay. Their options become, stop a legit scoring chance, or take a very short penalty.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad