I'm not entirely convinced peak Kariya is significantly better than Getzlaf.
Here's a comparison between their best seasons
Getzlaf 2013-14
2nd in points, 3rd in PPG, 2nd in Hart voting, 10th in selke voting.
10 more points than the 10th highest point producer 18 more points than 20th ranked.
Kariya 1996-97
3rd in points, 4th in PPG, 9th in goals, 5th in GPG, 2nd in Hart voting (competed against Lemieux's last award win)
11 more points than 10th highest point producer, 17 more points than 20th ranked point producer.
Both have a similar production gap over their competition, both were runner ups to unanimous Hart winners. Getzlaf has the physical and defensive edge, Kariya is a significantly better goal scorer.
As players, definitely not as lopsided as the poll would have you believe imo. If anything, it's pretty damn close.
I think it's a case of Kariya's raw totals jumping out in the "DPE" despite the early 2010s being a lower scoring era than the late 90, and the fact that Kariya was a much flashier player.
I rarely do this and I know you’ll say that you did, but you either were not following the NHL during the time or you totally forgot about Kariya and the opinion the league, fans, and media all held for him.
Looking at raw totals and surface level finishes is a huge tell and I see it in every single thread that relates to him.
For Getzlaf, finishing second to Crosby in scoring and Hart voting while Malkin missed his usual 22 games, Ovechkin barely scraped 1 PPG at age 28, Stamkos missed 45 games, Tavares missed 23, Zetterberg missed 37, and the crop of players directly behind in the scoring race are Giroux, Seguin, Perry, Hall, Kessel, etc is a lot different than:
Kariya finishing 3rd in the scoring behind Mario and teammate Selanne who played 9 more games, had 10 more points, and still finished a distant 5th in voting. Kariya missed 13 games. I’m not going to pretend that other elite players of the time also didn’t miss time (Jagr missed 19 games, Lindros 30, Sakic and Forsberg each missed 17 games), but Kariya likely only drops 1 spot in the Hart and Art Ross race if everyone in the league plays the full slate.
Hasek wins the Hart either way. Lindros almost certainly is runner up in the Art Ross race and runner up in Hart voting if he doesn’t miss the first 23 games of the season and 30 games overall. Kariya gets bumped down in each 1 spot.
It’s one thing to argue that Getzlaf had a better career (you mention the league being lower scoring in 2013-2014, but fail to mention that the league also does a far better job of protecting its superstars). I wouldn’t argue that Getzlaf’s relative good health, compiling, and a few good seasons gives him any sort of edge, but I can see the argument. It’s another thing to argue that he and Kariya are in the same stratosphere in terms of talent and peak.
What is also failed to mention is that 1997-1998 through 1999-2000 were all lower or equal to 2013-2014 in scoring (I will recognize that scoring at a surface level was still lower across the board for top level players in 13-14) and Kariya still had better seasons than anything Getzlaf ever had. Yes, coming back after a contract dispute in 1997-1998 and ripping off 17 goals and 31 points in his 22 games before getting concussed for the 4th time in 4 years is still a higher level than anything Getzlaf ever managed.
Kariya is not a player you can skim career stat logs, raw totals, and finishes to form the opinion that you have. Nor are the 90% who cast a vote for him blinded by nostalgia, foggy memories, and/or style over substance.