KariyaIsGod*
Guest
monster_bertuzzi said:He's a better playmaker, yes, but Ovechkin is twice the goalscorer.
Are you joking?
Crosby is not Ron Francis here...
monster_bertuzzi said:He's a better playmaker, yes, but Ovechkin is twice the goalscorer.
SectionX said:uh crosby is clearly playing on a team with more offensive talent than ovechkin. what is it, Lemiuex, Palffy, Leclair, Recchi and gonchar and tarnstrom from the blueline.
DrMoses said:Yeah, and those 6 sure looked great last night..
Clearly, they have some rust to shake off.
Lionel Hutz said:It was tounge in cheek. The constant pimping is tiresome and its been going on by the same group of posters in every thread on every topic for the past 2 years.
Crosbyfan said:At the same age Gretzky was finishing his first and only year of junior and Lemieux was just starting his third and final year of junior.
I am Jack's Fischel said:You know people, there is a great "Brodeur is over-rated" thread that can use some more horse-flogging...
DrMoses said:Are you joking?
Crosby is not Ron Francis here...
zetterberg40 said:i love how great some posters are. The guy was just displaying how great it is that a future hopeful icon is performing up to par, like many would have done if Crosby scored, and he gets bashed? what a joke...
i for one am thrilled he is doing well so far, tho its only one game, hopefully tomorrow or saturday, whenever he plays next he will continue the wave of short lived success thus far
Jaded-Fan said:If you can not see why a thread entitled 'Ovechkin shows why he is # 1' . . . after one whole game . . . is idiotic and inflamatory on its face, then I see no hope of convincing you otherwise. But I will at least try. If a thread had been started doing what you claimed, saying that AO looked pretty awesome and had a great debut, I doubt that there would have been much controversy. I in fact wholeheartedly agree with those sentiments. I was impressed. This thread did none of what you claim it did however. Nor was it intended to. This thread was entirely trolling for a reaction and in fact got just what the thread starter wished for.
Jaded-Fan said:If you can not see why a thread entitled 'Ovechkin shows why he is # 1' . . . after one whole game . . . is idiotic and inflamatory on its face, then I see no hope of convincing you otherwise. But I will at least try. If a thread had been started doing what you claimed, saying that AO looked pretty awesome and had a great debut, I doubt that there would have been much controversy. I in fact wholeheartedly agree with those sentiments. I was impressed. This thread did none of what you claim it did however. Nor was it intended to. This thread was entirely trolling for a reaction and in fact got just what the thread starter wished for.
Lionel Hutz said:Did anyone say that? I don't think any reasonable people are challenging that contention.
Personally, I now despise Ovechkin. Not because of anything he did, its because of posters like Eurocaps, Swoosh, CSKA etc.
DrMoses said:Are you joking?
Crosby is not Ron Francis here...
EroCaps said:The media is making a bush mistake ignoring Ovechkin and comparing Crosby to Lemieux and Gretzky.
It'll probably be a blessing in disguise for Ovechkin, bc in the end I can't find anything about Crosby's game outside of his dialect that makes him that much more valuable to the NHL.
Epsilon said:You know, after the first game of the season I'm thinking that Atlanta, Nashville, and Carolina should be contracted, while Tampa Bay should be moved to Winnipeg...
Beatnik said:it's very sad. Can't anyone appreciate both Corsby and Ovechkin??
DrMoses said:Are you joking?
Crosby is not Ron Francis here...
VanIslander said:Boston drafted both Joe Thornton and Sergei Samsonov early in the first round of the draft a few years ago.
Samsonov dominated his rookie season winning the Calder trophy. Thornton struggled and was sent down.
Who went on to emerge as the bigger star and more successful career to date?
.
gb701 said:You were doing fine until you just couldn't resist the inevitable comparison that would make "the kid" look just a little bit better.
Get your facts straight:
Crosby - Born Aug 7/87 - plays first pro game at the age of 18 years 2 months, give or take a couple of days.
Gretzky - Born Jan 26/61 - plays first pro game (WHA) in Indianapolis in the fall of 1978 - Age 17 years 8 months more or less. That follow one year of what would now be called Major junior (at 16), and two years of what would now be Junior A (starting at 14).
Stick to what you know.
Lionel Hutz said:Did anyone say that? I don't think any reasonable people are challenging that contention.
Personally, I now despise Ovechkin. Not because of anything he did, its because of posters like Eurocaps, Swoosh, CSKA etc.
Corto said:It goes both ways.
Most of the NHL fans (of teh other 29 teams) are getting sick of the Crosby hype.
And to be honest, so am I, even being a Pens fan.
IMHO; Ovechkin is the better player at the moment. And there are a few more rookies who I think will do better than Crosby this year.
That said... Crosby has the most potential.
And maybe surprisingly.. If I'd have to choose now a prospect and say "he's gonna have the best career".... I'd pick Evgeni Malkin over the entire rookie class currently in the NHL.
but you know what they say about opinions...
BTW; saying you DESPISE AO cos of something some fans said?? Well, they probably only said that cos of something Pens fans and the media are saying about Crosby.
Like someone said... Why can't you just enjoy both their games and be happy you get to watch them??
TransportedUpstater said:And North Americans can't be biased?
What about that time I heard someone try to tell me Glenn Anderson makes Valeri Kharlamov look talentless?