Dark Metamorphosis said:
people forget that mario dominated in the freeflying 80s and the deadpuck 90s/00s.
161 pts in 1996, 122 pts in 1997, 76 pts in 43 games in 2001, 91 pts in 67 games in 2003 as a 37 year old.
i have no doubt a healthy, 23 year old lemieux would put up 160+ pts in today's nhl
Don't forget that Lemieux had 51 points in his first 26 games in 2002-03. The last time someone reached 50 points that fast was in 1995-96 and his name was... Mario. Then his injuries/frustration/trades kicked back in and he wasn't the same in the second half of the season.
In any case, I clearly remember Mario being one of the best DEFENSIVE forwards in the game in his prime, at least when he wanted to be. If you can get your hands on the first round of the 1989 playoffs (Penguins/Rangers) you're going to see something just unbelievable. The way Mario was playing in his own end back then makes Mike Peca and Jere Lehtinen look like pee-wees.
Mario wasn't the most consistent player because of his injury poblems and sometimes a lack of dedication... but when he was at his top, there was NO one who could match him.
One thing about Mario is that people rely too much on his stats to judge him. Don't forget that there were a lot of games in the 90s in which he only played on the powerplay and stayed on the bench for most of the game. Also for many years (namely a good part of the 1992-93 and 1993-94 seasons among others) he almost never practiced with the team because of his injuries and still played games and dominated the score sheet. How do you think that a player who practiced as little as he did could even
play the game in the NHL and stay in shape?